Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 184.72.177.182

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Shows over 400 Backlinks in Google, but no link to them

How does this person do this?

     
6:28 am on Feb 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 28, 2002
posts:66
votes: 0


Ran into a site that has over 400 backlinks in google (completely unrelated), and when you go to any of the 400 backlinks, there is no link to this site. Checked the source code, no link! How does this person do this? I can't figure out how it's showing backlinks when it "appears" there are none? Redirect somewhere?

I got tired of trying to click on all the links to see how they even remotely went to the site.

6:50 am on Feb 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 8, 2000
posts:700
votes: 0


They using the source code from the Cached version of the linking pages. View/Source/Search/ now type in the link you are looking for.
6:56 am on Feb 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 28, 2002
posts:66
votes: 0


I'll have to check that out startup....didn't look at that...but seriously, now that I think about that....on over 400 sites that would be true?
6:58 am on Feb 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 28, 2002
posts:66
votes: 0


and wait a minute...I did check the source as you suggested..I'm half asleep here, but this is really boggling my mind...I know I'll lay in bed and try to figure out "how he do dat?"
7:20 am on Feb 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member powdork is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 13, 2002
posts:3346
votes: 0


I've often wondered if an seo could lurk here, get an early warning of the crawl, use a program to add invisible links to all his sites, and then remove them after the crawl. The only downside would be someone like you reporting it.
7:23 am on Feb 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 5, 2001
posts:279
votes: 0


They are likely cloaking (google gets the source with the links, everyone else gets the source without the links). Cloaking is against Google TOS.
7:42 am on Feb 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 28, 2002
posts:66
votes: 0


400 sites cloaking for this guy? Somebody has to let me sticky them to check this out...it is wild!
8:03 am on Feb 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 28, 2002
posts:66
votes: 0


I believe this guy does hosting services and other stuff through other sites of his, so he may be using this position to pull this off. Any thoughts?
8:24 am on Feb 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 25, 2002
posts:85
votes: 0


Sticky me the URL ... you got me curious
9:06 am on Feb 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

joined:June 28, 2002
posts:851
votes: 0


They are likely cloaking (google gets the source with the links, everyone else gets the source without the links). Cloaking is against Google TOS.
==================================================

thats what my 2 pence is on.

Shak

11:15 am on Feb 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 21, 1999
posts:38048
votes: 12


My guess, is that the backlinks showing are on redirects. Any redirected links (through cgi's) on the page?
2:02 am on Feb 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 28, 2002
posts:66
votes: 0


nope, brett....wouldn't those redirect links be on the page redirecting to this site...and I don't know where it is...I took one page with the least amount of links and clicked on every link and never got to this site...so I have no idea how it's happening...but the weird thing is all the pages are pretty similar in topic (completely unrelated to the topic of site in question, also)...hypothetical: the site is about food and all the backlinks are about carburetors...not that that matters, it's just curious they are all from same topic
2:12 am on Feb 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 28, 2002
posts:66
votes: 0


Interesting, the cached snapshot of the page is not the same site at all...and interestingly it is related to the same topic all the backlinks are related to....getting somewhere now in figuring this out...but I know nothing about cloaking or redirects or yada yada..so I don't even know what you call what this site is doing...obviously serving google something different than the site itself, and what is shown to google has links to it, hence backlinks to this site....
2:48 am on Feb 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 28, 2002
posts:66
votes: 0


ok, now this really confuses me...on the cached version (hypothetical site)is this:

This is G o o g l e's cache of [widgets.com...]
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: [google.com...]

Notice google says it's a cache version of one site, and to link to it or bookmark it, google gives the actual name of the site in question...

you all are probably laughing at me because you've probably all seen and discussed such sites before, but to me it's mind boggling how google doesn't even see it gives out too different sites info in the cache

2:51 am on Feb 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member marcia is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 29, 2000
posts:12095
votes: 0


I saw multiple dozens of links to some site that were all hidden in 0% frames. Also, I've seen hidden links in <noframes> of database driven template type sites in a competitive industry. The owners of the sites haven't got the foggiest idea it's being done.
3:50 am on Feb 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:May 14, 2002
posts:23
votes: 0


You say he provides hosting services also? Sounds like the clever guy might have all his hosting clients cloaking for him without them knowing. htaccess files are likely to be invisible to his hosting clients anyway.

If G finds out, the cloaking sites get pulled, not his.

Could be?

5:38 am on Feb 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 28, 2002
posts:66
votes: 0


what a drag that would be for the sites unknowingly cloaking...if they got pulled
9:09 am on Feb 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 7, 2003
posts:505
votes: 0


Jimmie,

Can you sticky me the URL as well?

10:19 am on Feb 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member vitaplease is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 11, 2001
posts:2725
votes: 0


I saw multiple dozens of links to some site that were all hidden in 0% frames. Also, I've seen hidden links in <noframes> of database driven template type sites in a competitive industry. The owners of the sites haven't got the foggiest idea it's being done

yes, all the clients of certain webdesigners, all interlinking to each other without knowing it, hidden in a redirected frame, .../bottom.html type of stuff.