Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Apache's Rewrite & Google Questions

Does our URL structure look good? And some Google Questions.

         

Catnip

9:07 pm on Jan 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member


OK we have created a new way of displaying our URL's and I want to check with all the great minds on here to see if they can see any problems with this new method. Here is an example of how a URL is written now on our website:
http://www.example.com/charters/city/1198/state/9/country/371/

And here is with our new rewriter method:

http://www.example.com/adventures/united-states_orlando.html

Now we are planning on changing over the website end of this month just before the Google deep crawl. The old URL's will give a moved permanently. Is this the best time to make this move and is using moved permanently the proper way of doing this? I know everyone is sick of hearing about Google, but it does bring us 75% of our traffic. We currently have over 40k pages listed in Google so we want to do this without disturbing our Google traffic.

Thanks for your time and comments,

CatNip
:)

lazerzubb

1:59 pm on Jan 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Everything looks very good to me, the whole solution i think will work right trough.

djgreg

2:01 pm on Jan 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think this is a good solution,

I think you should do it before the next deepcrawl, that the pages are in with the next update!

Marcia

2:05 pm on Jan 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>The old URL's will give a moved permanently

Just make sure it's 301 not 302.

rfgdxm1

1:32 am on Jan 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Definitely do it now. The deep crawl could come at any time.

jimbeetle

3:35 am on Jan 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



And this will be great for "derived" PR. Instead of a page being 7 or 8 steps away you've got it down to 2.

Chico_Loco

3:44 am on Jan 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Have you noticed any server performance hit's after making these changes?

I'd imagine rewrite for so many different URL's and level is complex and sluggish, is it not?

weteo

5:24 pm on Jan 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



To be perfect, use
[example.com...]
or
[example.com...]

"states_orlando" is not giving you any points

[example.com...]

atadams

5:36 pm on Jan 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



http://www.example.com/adventures/united-states_orlando.html

wouldn't be any different than

http://www.example.com/adventures/united-states-orlando.html

would it?

jpavery

5:43 pm on Jan 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



we did a site change last september (new urls) - losing our old URLs (eventhough they showed the home page - in fact www.mysite.com/anything.html would show the home page - and it was not a 404) killed us....

my recommendation - keep all your old URLs with the old content and let them fade away over time... it really really hurt us. Business almost folded...

weteo

6:21 pm on Jan 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



> [example.com...]
> wouldn't be any different than
> [example.com...]
> would it?

Yes, it is different. "-" acts as a separator, and uri is also indexed.

So you get points for "united", "states" and "orlando" keywords if you use separator.

"_" is not separator, you will get points only for "united" and "states_orlando" keywords.

But who on the earth will ever search for "states_orlando"

atadams

6:48 pm on Jan 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



You're right, my mistake...

Brett_Tabke

10:26 pm on Jan 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Also, the dash character is legal in the domain name. If a search engine wants to parse of dashed domain names, they might also look at dashed filenames. I've always felt it was safer to use the underline char for that reason.