Forum Moderators: open
His site has been submitted about 4 times now over the last 6 months. The two things that I suspect might be a problem are:
1. It is being hosted by a company which generates dynamic pages from templates.
and 2. Their system uses frames. However, the index page has its own metatags, and is also using the noframes tag. I've seen other frames sites get listed in google before.
Can anybody give me some advice? As I said, we've tried to submit the site many times, and had numerous discussions with the hosting company. They basically say they have no idea why it's not getting posted, since they have other sites using the same system that ARE being picked up by google.
Thank you in advance for your help!
[edited by: Marcia at 9:16 am (utc) on Nov. 27, 2002]
I don't know. While i recognize the importance of external links, and the high value google places on them, In my past experience, I have not found google to not list a site based solely on external links.
For example: Here are two sites that has been listed in google for two years now and has no external links posted to it. <snip>
So, while I will follow your advice to make sure there are some other sites that point to <snip>, I am pretty sure there is something else going on.
How does google know about the site? I've submitted the url to them manually, as i said, 4 times now in the last six months.
[edited by: Marcia at 9:15 am (utc) on Nov. 27, 2002]
[edit reason] no URLs or specifics, please [/edit]
However, here's another counterpoint: All of the links that I see that show up when I tried your suggestion are links that came into existence AFTER the sites had already been picked up by google. In other words, google accepted those sites before any other sites linked to them.
So tell me: Just how certain are you that the dynamic pages/frames are not the problem, that it is ONLY the linking issue that is preventing this site from being picked up by google?
This is a lesson on how google reads keyword relevancy and title, and apparently not much else!?
[edited by: ciml at 7:42 pm (utc) on Nov. 27, 2002]
[edit reason] No specifics please. [/edit]