Forum Moderators: open
I have to admit I thought Y! would go quicker towards charging for "value added" and "premium" services and were in a good position to do it. They DO have good services that all interealte with each other, especially for novice users.
Their mistake i feel is to also up the advertising content much faster. On dial up it's almost more trouble than its worth. Using both models aggressively I feel is too much long term for the average user.
Yahoo! (YHOO: Research, Estimates) now charges for many once-free services and peppers its site with a variety of ads that slow the site's loading speed.
I noticed about a month ago that when you hit a news story on Yahoo! and then click on the 'more' link there is an unnecessary pause before loading the small page so we can look at the ad for two seconds. As someone who pays monthly for cable to eliminate these delays, I find it very distasteful. Thankfully, the obnoxious full page ads that used to be at the entry to the sports pages are gone(as far as I can tell).
I'll be sad to see Yahoo! go, but only because I've been ranking so well there since the directory was downplayed.
They still have no pagerank. I would think they would have something coming out of the gate. Also, you would think one of those 157 could get to work on the Opera thing by now.