Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

PR Sequence

From start to establishing a PRx

         

Fiver_321

9:09 am on Nov 5, 2002 (gmt 0)



Hi,

I think this is my first post here on this name - I had another once but lost it......

Anyway, here is a factual solid example of the latest dance that I'd like a bit of light on if poss.

1. I have a site (A) in the index with a PR of 6. (for months this one has been drifting around - don't really do much with it)

2. I placed a text link on site (A) to site (B)

3. Google www cache shows the link on (A) to (B)

4. This dance, Google indexed site (B) - as a result of following site (A)s link - to the best of my knowledge anyway.
4.1. The indexing of site (B) occurred on www2 www3 etc with initially no title or description showing.
4.2. The listing was padded out at some stage - and transferred to www

5. www URL search shows site (B) now, but doesnt rank for term (which for sure could be various factors)

6. Site (B) has a white PR0

Other information about site (B) and general items.
Site is brand new.
Site has totally unique content.
Has three pages right now but plan many many more.
No small text - hidden text - keyword stuffing or anything.
38% KWD (two word phrase)
17,000 pages in SERP for quoted search term "word1 word2"
22,400 pages in SERP for unquoted term word1 word2

I have seen this in other examples.

Would anyone know possibly, why site (B) currently has a PR0? Will it rise? Is there a chance that PR is not updated yet as this is the first time (B) is indexed?

Thanks - any help would be appreciated - as I have a few instances of this sort of situation, across different hosts and different domains / topics/clients etc, maybe other people have experienced it.

Fiver.

rfgdxm1

10:26 am on Nov 5, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>No small text - hidden text - keyword stuffing or anything.
38% KWD (two word phrase)

38% KWD isn't keyword stuffing? I wouldn't take the risk of a page with one third as much keyword density.

Fiver_321

11:37 am on Nov 5, 2002 (gmt 0)



Its not a problem, the ranges of densities on problem sites
(this is just one) run from 25% to 55% or so.

So I dont think thats the cause of PR 0

Is it the case that if I dropped the densities on new sites then this PR0 would not occur? or do you think that maybe Google hasnt finished yet.