Forum Moderators: open
Basically, both are lists of sites with a description, so how do you tell one that is ok to get listed on from one that isn't.
What prompts the question is that I am looking at a particular directory (and there are others I'm looking at), with categories, and within the categories are lists of sites with a description. This directory is recommended as a good site to get listed on. But another well know site that has been given the label "link farm" in other forums follows the exact same format.
I would like to be able to name both sites to illustrate the point.
I suppose you could argue that OD and Yahoo directory are links farms, we know they aren't, but just what differentiates them from other sites that are labelled as link farms.
I know the real difference is that a link farm exists purely for the exchange of links, and a directory provides a useful selection of sites. But on the outside the 2 can look very much the same.
I wouldn't want to inadvertantly get my site listed on another site that is treated as a link farm, but at the same time would not want to miss getting listed in a legit directory just because I didn't know what label it carried.
Just how do you tell?
[stickysauce.com...]
I found the link above in Google, which also had a link to the following thread in the "Reciprocal Linkage Topics" board here at Webmaster World:
[webmasterworld.com...]
I'm sure you'll find a lot more information on link farms if you search Webmaster World and Google.
It's not how they look from the outside, but more the way a site is expected to link to them. And that makes sense from the 2 sites I was looking at. One asks for a load of categorised link pages to be placed on your site with one category relevant, a link farm. The other pukka directory doesn't.
Thanks again.