Forum Moderators: open
Besides the editorials, much of the news is the same on different websites...I'd rather read the same story on any newssite without popupsunders then the NYTimes... I do get your point... It's just that huge corporate sites like NYTimes using popupsunders makes me SO MAD haha.
Just a thought for what it's worth; when was the last time you ever caught yourself saying "Ooh goody! Look! An interesting pop up!"
Totally agree! Popunders (completely related to site content) ARE effective. If they weren't (and they must be,
considering how many people click on them) I would stop
using them in an instant. They are a totally legitimate
tool. So why do people seem to be so against them?
[edited by: heini at 10:20 pm (utc) on Nov. 1, 2002]
[edit reason] no specific urls/searches as per TOS & charter please / thanks! [/edit]
There's got to be some sort of penalty in there somewhere for excessive and recursive popups, which are undeniably annoying. But I have no hard evidence.
They are ten times more annoying than popups and that's saying a lot!
Start reading and the darn thing justs drifts across the screen right in front of the words...I personally hate them so much I don't go back to the site that has them!
Heard of any in-vue killers?
Ann