w.google and ww.google...

They are documented in these forums?

[SurferosDelSur]

Hi,

w.google and ww.google...

They are documented in these forums?

Verify: search,e.g; for "localize locale"

and...

wwww.google: 7260 sites
ww.google: 6850 sites
w.gogle: 6850 sites...

[dukeblue219]

I have not seen those sites before, but I'm sure somebody here has. It looks like they are identical to www2 and www3 from the searches I just tried. Does anyone else know what these are for sure?

[littleman]

>for
typos?

[CuriousWeb]

littleman, no w.google.com and ww.google.com both exist, I just tried, no idea if/what they represent though

[Mohamed_E]

% nslookup ww.google.com
Server: resolver1.level3.net
Address: 209.244.0.3
Name: www.google.com
Address: 216.239.51.101
Aliases: ww.google.com
% nslookup w.google.com
Server: resolver1.level3.net
Address: 209.244.0.3
Name: www.google.com
Address: 216.239.51.101
Aliases: w.google.com

Look like both are simply DNS aliases for www.

[newsparrot]

www-va.google. This, and 4 others are also used as well as the standard ww,ww2 ww3 during the dance. yet no one spk about them? They move as much as the other 3.

[SurferosDelSur]

Yes, for typos, identicals resultats, 588.000

And for many others. But, to believe me, they are sites/index real, although I ignore its weight and function in the set of Google (I discovered Them only days ago).

Also they change like the others. Sometimes several or all agree among them, as we see that it passes with ww2 and ww3.

I'am a spanish webmaster, not english speaker and a self-taught (autodidacto) SEO.
It could show more examples with resultos index of up to 200,000, reason why I have experimented until now. I mean, more examples in Spanish.
But as often they would appear in those results (in top10) webs mine, it would produce to me, so to speak, certain "blush Spam".

You in English experiment, please, and will they will be able to verify that, at least these days, exist w.google and ww.google with independent organization.

---------
Sorry: only altavista translation:-(

[edited by: SurferosDelSur at 10:03 pm (utc) on Sep. 27, 2002]

[littleman]

No, I mean for typos.

[CuriousWeb]

I get it now...sorry