Forum Moderators: open
Now, a new aptitude test Google is circulating purports to find the best and brightest. But is it really a brilliant ad campaign?
[internetnews.com...]
Quirky, is one of the words the article uses to describe the GLAT.
Here's a link to it.
http://www.google.com/#*$!/2004/09/pencils-down-people.html
"Pre-employment testing is a science, and [the answers to these questions] are not very objective data," said Sean Lally, an Encinitas, Calif.-based technology recruiter.
"[Hires] are going to be based the quality of the resumes," [Sean Lally] said. "Somebody who has real cultural issues might not get half of the jokes, but if he has a Ph.D. from MIT in the specific type of technology they need, they won't care if he doesn't get any of the cultural stuff."
Wow, Sean Lally would never be hired by Google. Did the writer of the article specifically seek out a commenter that would completely miss the point? Or did the writer also miss the point?
www.[the first 10 digit prime which appears in consecutive digits of e].com,
The website corresponding to the answer then asked one to decipher a pattern and use the next number in the sequence as a password at a third site. The third site redirected to googles hiring page.
It appeared on (a prominent geek portal) and both answers were given in a few hours, kinda killed the whole thing (interest wise) for me.
They also sponsored the world puzzle challange some months back. Overall they have some great recruiting stuff going on, brand yourself and be subtle about discriminitory hiring practices (IE your application takes priority so long as you solve this puzzle).
IMHO these puzzles (blatantly publicized) are not serious - they're just part of G's PR marketing. Sure Google probaby doesn't hire dimwits, but they probably have plenty of plebes on staff that can't solve a quadratic equation. but they'd have you believe they're an elite crew of Mensa geniuses.
And frankly I think it works. It's a great campaign. I like doing puzzles. and I also wouldn't mind working at Google. wouldn't you?