Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.162.232.51

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

google cookie

     
7:57 pm on Aug 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:July 1, 2004
posts:39
votes: 0


Can anyone here comment on the google cookie? This is the first I have heard that google tracks all searches via cookie and IP. It is ostensibly used for personalizing searches, but it is basically a wiretap on your searching.

Does this not taint the purity of results if the results are different for different people?

10:10 am on Aug 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 21, 1999
posts:38070
votes: 16


You've been reading Everymans [webmasterworld.com] site again.

>cookie

One of the most indefensible arguments every put forth in an internet debate.

It is 2004 dudes - wake up. The cookie wars were in 1996.

I have 1000 cookies in my browser cookie jar. I'd guess 90% of them are far worse than the Google cookie.

11:13 pm on Aug 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:July 1, 2004
posts:39
votes: 0


Yes, we all have tons of cookies and most are harmless, but how does that validate the concept of providing different results for different people searching for the same phrase?

And I dont think it is common knowledge that IP's are tracked by google - atleast it wasnt for me.

1:42 am on Aug 9, 2004 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 13, 2004
posts:428
votes: 0


You've been reading Everymans site again.

Nope he's been reading Scarecrow's [webmasterworld.com] site again. ;)

1:51 pm on Aug 9, 2004 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator goodroi is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:June 21, 2004
posts:3254
votes: 210


I wouldn't worry so much about the Google cookie. The Google toolbar with advanced features is more important to worry about.
5:28 pm on Aug 9, 2004 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 13, 2004
posts:208
votes: 0


The Google toolbar with advanced features is more important to worry about.

When the toolbar phones home for PageRank it reads your Google cookie with the unique ID in it. If you don't have a cookie it gives you one. The toolbar is able to track your surfing because of the cookie. Without the cookie, the toolbar would have to rely only on your IP address for tracking.
7:09 pm on Aug 9, 2004 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:July 1, 2004
posts:39
votes: 0


Here is what google says they use the cookie for:
"Google does this by storing user preferences in cookies and by tracking user trends and patterns of how people search."

And here is what info google tracks for user searches:
" Google collects limited non-personally identifying information your browser makes available whenever you visit a website. This log information includes your Internet Protocol address, browser type, browser language, the date and time of your query and one or more cookies that may uniquely identify your browser."

So the cookie is not as harmless as most run of the mill session cookies and google is not as non-invasive as most people think.

They track who you are (your ip does uniquely identify you even if your cookie is disabled - as the RIAA can attest), what you search and when and they keep that information. That is an aweful lot of info they are compiling on every person.

Now how about those tie ins to the federal govt?
They will share these dosiers with third parties if:
" We conclude that we are required by law or have a good faith belief that access, preservation or disclosure of such information is reasonably necessary to protect the rights, property or safety of Google, its users or the public."

It is a no-brainer these days to conclude reasonable necessity for sharing this info for the safety of the public.

So it seems reasonable to conclude google is spying on us and sharing that info.

But my real quesiton is not about privacy. It is about google's crazy idea that search results are somehow changed based on past history. You searched for timbuktu yesterday and email readers today, so I will show you email readers in timbuktu.

That is not a sensible idea - ever. If the user wants email readers from timbuktu, they can add it to the line. But how can a user exclude things google adds from his history that he doesnt know is being included in the search?

7:26 pm on Aug 9, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:June 13, 2003
posts:1233
votes: 1


>>>It is 2004 dudes - wake up.

I haven't heard that word dudes since,I don't know,hmmm, maybe 1996.;)

7:32 pm on Aug 9, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

joined:May 21, 2002
posts:762
votes: 0


>It is 2004 dudes - wake up. The cookie wars were in 1996.

Actually Cookies were invented in 1994 by Lou Montulli :)

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members