Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 188.8.131.52
Forum Moderators: open
I am talking about traffic of nearly 7 k from google everyday and hence its a sizable decrease.
Looking for early answers on how we could check the things
Luckily my situation is not quite as severe.
We are number 1 for most phrases on all other search engines, of which make up 50% of our traffic so unfortunately I am not prepared to test your findings (although I would like to).
I'm now of the opinion; Google lost us, we did not lose Google ;)
After that (13th/14th), I've altered alt tags from "pix" or "spacer" to be keyword relevant. I've added H1 tags to the article titles (in article page) and modified the TITLE tag to contain article title. I also changed the title on the main page to contain three keywords + the title site.
the keyword density went to about 6%.
My site dropped from 89th to 124th place.
Is this a problem because of the changes or the google_SERP/google_SERP_algo upgrade that happened on the 13/14th?
erkylefrak: Are you saying that H tags, image alt tags and other stuff (like the changes I made) have to be removed?
p.s. Google has indexed 9100 pages on my site.
[edited by: Phiber at 5:03 pm (utc) on Aug. 16, 2004]
Sounds like it's time to either educate your boss about the benefits of PPC, or the reality of free traffic (or both).
I suppose you could say its not free for his boss if he has to pay someone to engineer the site for Google.
Something people forget - unless you can do it yourself it is far from free.
It goes back to that same problem... the competition... 3 different sites, have not moved from their positions in the SERPs through this whole thing while we have... oddly. I think maybe they shifted one or two places back and forth.
So no matter what I tell him, prove to him, show him, he thinkas that if they can stay we should be there, end of story.
And,BTW- link:thisdomaininquestion.com brings only 18 links, none of which are "blue thingamabobs" related.
The idea is that Google has decided that self-description have little information value because is always biased. The only information value is what independent sites and persons tell about you. So Google assigned to self description pages the rank coefficient close to zero.
It explains why:
1.Many index pages got PR0. Just because index pages naturally describe their own site and hence has 0 information value. I believe the most good inbound links are not to index page also.
2.The value of cross-links in the side become close to 0. Again because it is biased self-description.
3.The value of outbound links increased. If you link to other good sites it shows that you try to be objective and not biased
4.Many optimized sites suffered. Just because all optimization based on self cross links (e.g. keywords in the links, keywords in <H1> in index pages) lost its value. No banning or punishment.
5.Many good sites have suffered. It may be illusion. As I mentioned mostly probably index page have suffered because it is self-description. Also the values of inbound links were recalculated.
Bottom line. Google now more trusts what others say about your and what you say about others but not what you say about yourself.
When did you guys mainly notice traffic drops from Google? Is it within this week/month/2months?
I personally have optimized my site with ALT tags, bold <h1>s, and the meta and title descriptions. I was thinking of using the "summary=" tag for every table as some competitors have done, but I am afraid of having too many of the keywords on the page.
If you do a search for "SEO" on google you will find that some of the top ranking sites don't seem to be penalized for these actions. They also have <h1> tags and <b> tags throughout their main pages.
I tend to get really nervous and screw with my pages quickly, but in this instance I think a lot of it is speculation.
The truth is, using <b> is normal, using <h1> tags is normal, and linking to and from sites that are related and unrelated is normal, which indicates to me that Google will probably not penalize you for it.
If they simply de-valuate these techniques, i don't really care. I'll just move on and do what needs to be done.
As of yet I have not heard really any reliable theories on what is going on with Google, so I am sitting tight.
interesting but i would question how much relevance the home page going to pr0 has to anything being discussed here.
googleguy himself just explained in another thread that google's algorithms try to determine the home page and they can get confused if you accidentally point to a different form of the home page (i.e. if you link to www.example.com/index.asp in addition to www.example.com).
if googleguy's silence on the recent changes is not just laziness or because of vacation and is instead strategic - i.e. ipo silence or unwillingness to divulge trade secrets or whatever - then i think his breaking his silence to announce this problem with home pages is pretty darn significant. he must have been itching at the chance to correct a lot of wild theories without divulging too much more than he needed to. so i would be hesitant to base any broader theories on a home page problem of a few.
Jeez. I'd re-read at that statement and think about it. Think real hard as a grown up. Accept the fact that you're playing with the big boys and no one is going to watch your back.
I can assure you, if you're relying on advice from Google in any form, you and 200,000 other webmasters are going to follow the same techniques and it will be put on a future devaluation list.
why should he tell you (or me for that matter) how to beat google's algo?
i think you're right on. i speculated about other reasons googleguy might not be talking but the very best one is that google is quite happy not revealing details about what they did recently because they don't want the spammers to know.
as for shri's comment, i really think that's horribly unfair to googleguy. i think googleguy has been trying to give constructive advice where he can. googleguy does not give webmasters tips about how to game the search engines, just basic info that will help them avoid sure pitfalls.
how advice on properly doing 301 redirects or making sure your home page is consistently listed is going to get you banned along with "200,000 other webmasters" is beyond my understanding. shri, i for one would be happy if you did exactly the opposite of what googleguy recommends as best practices.
so, by devaluing internal links and boosting external links, that will only play into the hands of people with a large network of sites.
No change whatsoever in traffic, apart from increase commensurate with additional pages indexed. We operate quite a few big sites (50,000+ pages) and no small sites.
What has been a problem since early August is getting google to index additional pages created. Then over last weekend google visited these new category pages and traffic took a big jump on Monday (about 20%).
I have not the faintest idea why people have lost traffic - I look at the SERPs and I honestly see no difference between results I saw a few weeks ago.
There are 2 things though that should be considered:-
1. Recent posts in PPC forums about a drop in espotting clicks. Espotting, along with a few other US PPC engines, derive a huge amount of their income from directory-style affiliate sites that are several hundred thousand or several million pages, with each page focused on a search term, and they perform in google results and users click and the affiliate gets paid. At SES in London Matt Cutts made clear that these sites were in their sights. How many of you posting are these types of affiliates or are other affiliates who closely resemble in structure and content these directory sites? Having said that I cannot see a whole lot having disappeared but there are so many of them that google could have got half of them and we wouldn't even notice
2. Google turning the optimisation screw, and in particular the links screw. For a long time we have been saying, do not do reciprocal links, don't link from within networks etc etc. As we don't I cannot comment on whether google has now even more heavily targeted this area, but I would not be surprised. So again, have many of you relied on these types of "artificial links"?