Forum Moderators: open
site:example.com inurl:example also, it seems to be a habbit of mine to do this, so here goes. note that google's page estimates are known to be way off
(Total 13,869,180)
(JPG+JPEG 6,630,000)
GIF 5,030,000
JPG 4,640,000
PNG 2,160,000
JPEG 1,990,000
(TIF+TIFF 33,588)
TIF 33,100
BMP 15,500
TIFF 488
(PNM+PPM+PGM 92)
PNM 47
PPM 33
PGM 12
Food for thought?
Muskie
The site did suffer from problems earlier this year when the server it was hosted on was hacked. This lead to a number of problems for a while. So I wondered if we happened to just miss being spidered. In checking back, Google's Image bot visited in April and then never again. It had also spidered the previous couple of months to April. I have seen other spidering breaks in the past when we remained in the index. So I'm really puzzled why we disappeared this time. Hopefully a glitch that will fix itself in the next spidering / update cycle.
In a search on the image database My first impression was how similar the results were to those in the main index. Not what I had come to expect in a search for an image. The pages listed were filled with text. A LOT of text. Would love to see how the variables are weighted in the algo.
Librarian
Muskie
Muskie