Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Thoughts on new linking machine

indirect linking scheme design

         

Internetter

6:09 pm on Mar 8, 2004 (gmt 0)



Hi All!
At last joined in!

So the world of Google has become unsure and we do not know where we will be:)
I have suffered from the latest changes and IMO link exchange pages let me dowm.

To overcome this here is an idea.

A link echange is accepting members by categories. Food, camping, etc

Than at random members are given N sites to link and words to include in link texts for each link. URLs selected at random automatically from the users accounts.
Words also from users keywords they choose when registering.

Links must be employed within text inside pages.

IMHO it does not matter too much what pages are as the more natural it looks the less effected will be the scheme by the algo changes.

No link to the scheme site from members sites.
No links to members from cheme site.
Google never finds out who are members.

Briefly that is all.
I will be glad to find out that my idea has already been developed into a real scheme as it usually happens ;)

Comments welcome


PS: I am not stoned honest:)

martinibuster

8:25 pm on Mar 16, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Seems like a lot of work.

Chndru

9:28 pm on Mar 16, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



hmm...maybe an advanced version of 'Buddy Links' come to mind.

Stefan

9:55 pm on Mar 16, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



They'd show up as a cluster wouldn't they? I don't know, man, G might catch it all the same. You would have all of them interlinked after just a few backlink steps. If you were to put it on one of the graphical internet maps, it would stand right out... the algo must be able to do the same.

SyntheticUpper

10:03 pm on Mar 16, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hmmm, but we're outside the castle walls.

And even those inside the castle walls don't have the inner sanctum knowledge of the pubcon :)

Ooooooh!

Google results are crap though, so stop worrying about it :)

GoogleGuy

12:22 am on Mar 17, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



SyntheticUpper: I've been reading your posts for a while now--why so much sarcasm/unhappiness? It's your right to do drive-by comments like that, but it makes me want to answer questions less. If you've got specific searches that you don't like the results on, send us a report--that's the right place to complain about a specific search. I checked our email queue and spam reports for anything with the nickname 'SyntheticUpper' and didn't find any matches, but I'd be happy to hear which results you dislike.

Stefan

1:27 am on Mar 17, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



GG - Your patience is a cornerstone.

And your presence is much appreciated. Respect.

ADDED: And welcome to Webmasterworld Internetter. It might be a dodgy scheme but it's good to have you onboard anyway.

BigDave

1:33 am on Mar 17, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I would not recommend it unless you are playing with throw away domains.

shrirch

2:08 am on Mar 17, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Been discussed here... (make sure you look at the date)

[webmasterworld.com...]