Forum Moderators: open
I don't think Google has switched to continuous update yet.
Fwiw, we've had a series of about sixteen pages added to Google for our site roughly around the 10th. They were spidered on the 5th. These dates were post Esmerelda, and not fresh. They have been stable and driving great traffic to our site since. (Thanks WebmasterWorld!)
Yesterday we had a couple of pages updated and no freshtags were present. Time will tell for these ones.
I had a page that was a PR2. on May 9th, I got a link from a PR6 page, which all links from it have a PR5 or higher. Nothing has changed on that page (links or content) and the page appeared in all search results about where I would have expected a PR2 to be. Then sometime between July 10th & 15th, it jumped to page 1 on two search terms I track which is about where I'd expect it to be with a PR5. The tool bar still shows PR2.
Therefore, I believe the 'real' PR for the page is 5 but just not showing on the tool bar.
Are the days of named monthly updates over? Or is freshbot just doing a REALLY good job even picking up brand new sites.. In any event, thanks Google!
A reason for the behaviour described by LogicMan as well as larger fluctations might be that anchor text is continuously updated. However, this doesn't mean necessarily that PR is updated.
A reason for the behaviour described by LogicMan as well as larger fluctations might be that anchor text is continuously updated. However, this doesn't mean necessarily that PR is updated.
I have seen this on one of my websites. I changed the anchor text on about 50 pages that link to us, that Google has already found and I went from page 3 to page 1 about a week and half ago.
I have validated the css and html, so shouldn't it be going up? Well, they've got a good name eh? Google, I've gone googly-eyed from watching my bouncing site.
Also, am I banned from starting a new thread, I get this message on every attemt for the last few months;
"status:
On Hold: This discussion is temporarily on hold pending administrative review.
This simply means there was something about the post worth reviewing before public viewing.
It could also mean work is being performed on the thread or forum."
- same here about the on-hold message BTW
Sod it it can stay as it is now :( I'm not remailing all my linkers to say as you were guys..
As a trainee pilot my instructor kept telling me to look out the window instead of chasing the gauges for the right numbers. Get things looking right through the big glass thing in front of your face he said, and all the little dials will magically start reading right all on their own.
Methinks the same applies to seo!
#40: pr3
#41: grey
#42: grey
#43: pr0 >> me
#44: pr1
#45: pr1
#46: grey
#47: pr3
#52: pr5
#54: pr4
#62: pr6 >> this must be wrong
Can I trust toolbar?
Gus
About a month or two ago, the backlinks for my site (indentified when a 'link:http://www.domain.com' search is done) dropped to 8 from a couple hundred.
I haven't been too concerned because of all the issues related to the changes Google has been going through for the last few months.
Here is the question, 'Should I be concerned that the search above is still only showing 8 links?'
I am asking this now because Googleguy recently stated that all backlinks should now be pretty much up to date.
Any comments?
BUT -- The real mystery is when will Google synchronize its directory with DMOZ? We're now going on something like four months or more since Google last synched-up with DMOZ's directory. I'm now listed in DMOZ and feel like I'll never get a decent PR until Google acknowledges teh DMOZ entry. In my category alone, 20 new sites were added in DMOZ since last April and not a single one shows up in Google's directory...
-Paul