Indexed in Less than 48 hours

This is getting good

[Go60Guy]

Remember the by-gone days of AltaVista and Infoseek, when you could submit and, by golly, the next day there was your site all nicely ranked, etc., since you were then a fledgling SEO on the make.

I went live with a site late in the evening of July 9, PDT, and as of this morning, 7:30 AM, July 11, the site is indexed and ranking very well for all my targeted keywords. That's happened consistently lately, and the sites haven't fallen out to reappear again later.

This is getting good.

[EandA]

So tell us what you acutally did to get this quick indexing by Google?

Thanks

[thewebboy]

Yeah I can get a site listed in Google in 48 hours too, but not fully indexed. All you need is a link from a high "google valued" (one that google "likes") site.

[Krapulator]

I have noticed this also in the last few weeks. New content is getting in at a very rapid pace. I'm watching this merry go round with great interest.

[metagod]

you don't need a link from a highly respected website..

i have sites that have pr0's that google already knew about and then as soon as i put up some content the next day the new content is there..

so wicked!

[austtr]

Have the actual backlinks of these newly indexed sites been factored into their SERP's or has Google still to build a backlink picture for the site and apply that at some later stage?

Put that another way... could those initial SERP's change significantly because algo factors relating to backlinks have not been applied to them yet? (I'm ignoring other filters for the purpose of this exercise)

If a new site appears in the index at #87 then there is a natural inclination to start looking for problem areas... but if the backlinks have not been taken into account, then that result could be misleading. That remedial work may not be necessary at all.

Of course the reverse also applies when the site starts at top 10 and drops out of sight when the backlinks are factored in.

[Need More Hits]

Yes this has happened to me also in about 24 hours time

And another webmaster that I know has had his new pages
Searchable in less than 12 hours last month

[metagod]

austtr good point..

on my sites none of the backlinks have been updated (or pr for that matter), but what i am seeing is the site being updated and receiving traffic withing 24hrs of the update..

i guess we have to wait and see if things change once the backlinks get updated... (if it ever happens)

[sajjid]

i think its normal to get listed very quickly these days as it happened to me first the site was listed by fresh bot within 24 hours then at the end of the month i had deep crawl and now when i search for my chosen keywords which i know only my site has and one other site which has the same title except the end bit which is .com and mine is .org.
these are the results from google for my site but this contains one result from the other site which is just a holding page.
Results 1 - 10 of about 3,450. Search took 0.15 seconds

[johnnydequino]

It's wierd. Sometimes I will get a page indexed in 48 hours, other times no. I have 30 pages of new content waiting to get indexed in the past month. 2 pages out of the 30 got indexed within 48 hours. Makes no sense

jd

[johnnydequino]

Interesting - when I look at my cache of my homepage I just got about 25 out of my 30 new content pages cached. But none of the 25 actual pages are cached. Is that normal?

jd

[Dave_Hawley]

Isn't simply a case of 'pot luck' on how quick Google picks up new pages? If you upload them just after google has visted your site, you will be waiting sometime. If, on the other hand, you upload the pages 12 hours before google visits, you're in luck!

Dave

[johnnydequino]

Yesterday, the google cache of my home page was updated. Today, the google cache of my home page has reverted to one month ago. Can anyone advise me if this is normal?

Thanks - jd

[mayor]

thewebboy >> All you need is a link from a high "google valued" (one that google "likes") site.

Anyone have some ideas on how to find/identify high Google valued sites? ie page rank, inbound links, outbound links, freshness in SERPs, etc.

[metagod]

i'd say that yahoo.com and dmoz.org would be a good bet on being some "respected" urls in google's point of view :-)