Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Why does google mix up PR sorting in results?

why does a ALLINURL search bring low PR above high PR sometimes?

         

killroy

12:12 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I ahve a large diretory site, and it jsut occured to me that a
allinurl: domainname categoryscriptname
and
allinurl: domainname detailscriptname

should give me a ranked list of my category and detail pages by PageRank. but I sometiems find PR 4 pages above PR 5 pages. It's "roughly" correcty, with PR 4 and 5 at the top and 1-3 at the bottom, but why does it bring PR 4 above PR 5?

After all there is no keyword that can be ranked higher or lower. The script name doesn't appear on the page.

garylo

12:32 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



There are other factors other than PR and body keywords that affect rankings.

killroy

12:41 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



But an allinurl search doesn't search for keywords in the body.

so in effect its a "keywordless" search, simply to identify a particular page.

I thought in this case RAW PR should be te only ranking factor.

garylo

12:58 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



As I said, it factors in more than just PR

nirelan2

5:11 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)



Why not just use a search engine that works like Alltheweb or Teoma?

killroy

6:02 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The don't work.

Google brings me millions of people every year. Not so the ones you have mentioned.

Therefore what you say is simply not true. They don't work.

nirelan2

6:14 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)



They work its just that Google has a bigger share of searchers than they do alought they have better technology than Google. Just imagine if everyone used a diff search engine than Google. You could get millions of hits to all your pages not just the ones Google decides to index.

killroy

6:17 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hey! great, maybe it'll index those pages I haven't made yet. Hell I'm not even sure I have all those 70000 pages Google indexed of my javascript linked, dynamically generated frames based site.

And if everybody in the world sent me a dollar, I'd be rich.

It's like saying if MS didn't exist more people might use linux.... erm... yeah, I guess...

nirelan2

6:29 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)



If Google cant index your page and Alltheweb can that means Alltheweb works.

BigDave

7:22 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



nirelan2,

Maybe if all those wonderful search engines would index more than 52 (the number in Ink which is the highest of the "others") pages of my site opposed to Google's complete crawl of my 2400 pages, I would bother with them.

If they don't have all my pages indexed, I suspect that there are many other sites out there that they are missing out on.

Until they try a lot harder, to index everything, then Google its it.

nirelan2

7:32 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)



Well congrats to you for getting Google to index it all. I am talking about the majority of sites though.

BigDave

7:52 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



First off, it seems to me that you hijacked this discussion to something it was never meant to become. I don't wee what any other search engine has to do with the original question.

My point (and this is the last time I will make it) is that if none of the other search engines is able to find more than 52 of my pages after 8 months and hundreds of high ranking incoming links, I have trouble believing that the other search engines come anywhere close to google in their coverage of the informational sites that I, and most surfers, am interested in.

They may have better search technology, but they have to index the sites I am interested in for it to actually be useful. They do not. I have tried several searches on the other engines and they never come anywhere near Google in the quality of their results.

I you search for sites that participate in PFI, then you probabl will do better.

JayC

8:14 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



But an allinurl search doesn't search for keywords in the body.
so in effect its a "keywordless" search, simply to identify a particular page.

I thought in this case RAW PR should be te only ranking factor.

But there's really no reason to make the assumption that an "allinurl:" search is handled the same way as a regular query, with the results ranked by the same algorithms. Other types of searches, like "link:" for example, also don't seem to be -- and there's really no reason for them to be (other than that it'd help you to figure out the relative PageRanks of the set of pages).

nirelan2

9:37 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)



Dave,Alltheweb has more of your sites indexed than you say. ATW has many more sites than Google indexed which mean if what you want is not found in ATW its probable not in Google.

kevinpate

10:27 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



killroy, it's probably no more than a reasonable effort to avoid making algo factors more difficult to nail down. If the algo was obvious, its value would be diminished.

nirelan2, have you considered the possibility of just starting a thread called "Jump on da Nirelan2 bandwagon - Dump Google today" instead of jumping unproductively from post to post to write trash on an se, which even you concede, is far and away the current people's choice?

So long as John and Jane Q Public prefer to use google substantially more than the other se's - folks who want the public to find them online are going to be curious about and be thinking about google.

I'm reminded of the snicker on when a reporter asked the outlaw why he robbed banks ... "Because that's where the money is."

nirelan2

10:33 pm on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)



Well if my post wasnt removed because I dont like Google maybe I could start that.All I have done is tell the truth about Google.

killroy

12:28 am on Apr 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Well I resorted to shoft-clickign the first couple of pages, dumping them in excel and resorting :)

Good enough for my purposes, but without some algorythmical way of getting the PR (like readign it of a page on google.com) I'll never be sure I haven't missed some PR5 pages somewhere deep in my database.

As you can imagin if I could identify a few 10s or 100s of PR5 in my 10000s of pages, then those would be valuable targets for paied advertisments.

I guess I'll keep going by traffik which is the ultimate ranker :)

PS: Thanks for bringing my post back on topic.

Chris_R

12:36 am on Apr 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Keep in mind when using all in title/anchor/url/ whatever - google hasn't put as much work into them as the others.

As a short smart a** answer to the question:

why does a ALLINURL search bring low PR above high PR sometimes?

for the same reason all the rest of their searches do.

should give me a ranked list of my category and detail pages by PageRank

This is incorrect.

PR is but one of 100 factors - by eliminating all pages that don't contain the word in the url - there are still - well 100 factors that could be used.

Oh wait - I think I get what you are misunderstanding:

ALLINURL doesn't mean:
JUST IN URL

If it did - what you say makes sense.

killroy

11:54 am on Apr 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Ok that finalyl explains it.

When it does an allinurl, it STILL keyword ranks the page for those terms. So if even one page has one of the words on te site, or some sites that link to it have it would be ranked higher.

That indeed explains it. Thanks.