Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.162.239.134

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Cloaking with Google?

     
11:49 pm on Apr 8, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Ok heres the question? What about cloaking google? Im confused about how to do that because of how they cache? Can someone fill me in on this?
john
11:52 pm on Apr 8, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



cloak like you would for anyone else and include the infamous NOARCHIVE tag on the page you're serving to Google.
11:58 pm on Apr 8, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



If you are cloaking because your content is dynamic, is the tag really needed?
If you are cloaking for design, doesn't the tag give it away?

Air

12:23 am on Apr 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>doesn't the tag give it away?

Not really, because many sites with dynamic content and no cloaking will also use the noarchive tag to avoid having stale content captured.

Personally I haven't experienced much difference with or without the tag, so most often choose to prevent Google from caching.

3:48 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hello.
I am new to this Cloaking idea, and I just have a question. How could Google detect a cloaked page if it had something like:

PHP CODE:
<?
if(preg_match("/MSIE/i",$HTTP_USER_AGENT)) header("Location: www.widgets.com");
?>

So the code would detect if the user had an IE browser, and if so, forward them to another URL. Could Google detect this, and if so, they would penalize the site correct?

(edited by: jrap at 4:05 am (utc) on May 26, 2002)

Air

4:03 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Could Google detect this, and if so, they would penalize the site correct?

Using redirection is not a good idea, most likely it will be penalized or it will be handled badly (i.e. wrong page indexed).

True cloaking does not return any redirect code(that's how search engines detect redirects), it simply delivers the page to the requesting entity, usually by server side code.

4:08 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The short code snippet I posted is in PHP (..should have specified, sorry) which is server side. Basically that code would be executed before any other headers are sent out.

Air

4:16 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yes I spotted the PHP, but "header("Location: www.widgets.com"); " sets the redirect code, that's what I was cautioning against.
4:18 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Air, ah, I see. Thanks for the response thus far.

How would google notice the redirect if the code only executes if the browser is IE?

Air

4:22 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>How would google notice the redirect if the code only executes if the browser is IE?

The people that get redirected will tell them ... especially if you outrank them.

4:28 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member digitalghost is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



>>The people that get redirected will tell them

Bingo. The people that are getting busted cloaking are getting turned in by their competitors. Competitive markets ensure it.

Cloaking needs to be imperceptible to the engines, AND human viewers.

DG

5:03 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Question then,
If I already redirect to a subfolder on the server side, should I have the cloaked page in the same folder so that there is no folder difference?
for example:
www.somesite.com
redir to
www.somesite.com/somesite/

thats what a viewer would see.
now if it was a spider
it would redir to
www.somesite.com/somesite/spidypage.aspx?

Air

3:55 pm on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



There is a thread here [webmasterworld.com] that goes into a fair bit of detail on how server side cloaking without redirection retrieves and serves content.
 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month