Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

Another 301 redirect topic

listing with and without .html

         

quiet

10:02 pm on Oct 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have a page that shows twice in google like the following

a)
/this_directory/page.html

and b)
/this_directory/page

"b" always shows as an indentation under "a".

I'm looking at making a 301 redirect from "b" to "a".

All my links use "a" but it seems like "b" is the only one getting its google cache refreshed. beddy strayange

One of my main concerns is having google penalize thinking they are duplicate pages.

I'd love to see what other people have to say about this.

Thanks!

--q

jdMorgan

12:16 am on Oct 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



quiet,

> All my links use "a" but it seems like "b" is the only one getting its google cache refreshed. beddy strayange

Yes, that is strange... Somebody must be linking to "b"

A 301 should fix this.

As to duplicate content, a situation like this happens all the time, and I wouldn't be too worried about it, except that it is "not tidy." Duplicate content like this is resolved when G takes a look at the two pages, realizes they're the same, and keeps whichever one has the higher PR.

Duplicate content "penalties," I believe, are assesed when more than one or a very few "unrelated" pages have the same content and the "offense" is not excusable by reason of multiple extensions (like your case), "index.html" aliased to "/", and www- vs. non-www domain duplication. I suspect, but cannot prove, that duplicate-content penalties are primarily triggered by spam reports, and not automatically. It is also my opinion that only sites that duplicate pages intentionally to gain unfair competitive advantage need to worry about it.

If this were my site, I'd do the 301 just to clean up the ambiguity, and try to find out who is linking to "b" and why, and get them to fix it.

Jim

quiet

5:47 pm on Oct 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks jd.

I couldn't find any links to the "b" scenario but went ahead with the redirect. I'll do a quick post with results after things get updated for anyone else that might run across a similar situation.

--q