Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 50.19.190.144

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL

Message Too Old, No Replies

Mozilla, getting better?

Shock U turn.

     
2:28 pm on Jul 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 21, 2001
posts:419
votes: 0


I've been the first to bash mozilla recently (the open source Netscape successor - see [mozilla.org...] )so it's only fair that I point out when I see something good :).

I downloaded the latest nightly build last night and I have to say it it much faster than previous and seems as fast or faster than Opera. I havent used it for long enough to identify any stability problems though.

Anyone else keeping tabs on the nightly builds?

2:58 pm on July 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 8, 2001
posts:1402
votes: 0


I have been using Netscape 6.1 recently ('know your enemy' sort of thing) and have to say it is streets better than Netscape 6.0.

Not sure which Mozilla version it is based on now, but it has been faster and so far pretty stable.

hmmm... might have to eat some words soon.

3:22 pm on July 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 8, 2001
posts:309
votes: 0


I have been trying mozilla for 2-3weeks and have to agree it is quick and seems stable.
I still have netscape 4.7 - better safe than sorry.;)
4:01 pm on July 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member littleman is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:June 17, 2000
posts:2924
votes: 0


I believe Netscape 6.1 is based on Mozilla 0.9.1. I think the Linux version is getting.
4:39 pm on July 24, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member macguru is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 30, 2000
posts:3300
votes: 0


Just trying it for the first hour. Still shaken from the massive trauma version 6.0 caused me, I waited to read more about it here before even trying the new patch.

In my humble opinion it is a great improvement from version 6.0. But it is not as fast as Opera yet! It takes almost 20 seconds to load on my PC and almost 10 on my Mac.

I am glad Netscape "transition" made me discover Opera. It became my preferred browser for overall job stuff.

As for the MS thing, I believe it is unfit for the SEO job. It takes too many clicks to deactivate JavaScript or clear cookies. I am still looking for a way to view a frame source or switch user agent... how can anyone do a serious technical analysis of any site with this stuff? I simply do not understand why people choose to use MSIE that take soooooo loooooong to render complex pages and crashes the whole box along because of it's own deficiencies.

Simply beats me

8:33 pm on July 24, 2001 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 21, 2001
posts:419
votes: 0


It still seems to gobble memory, currently I have Opera open with 8 pages open using 25MB of ram, mozilla is sitting in my task tray (I havent opened it yet) and is using 17MB.

I am using the "quick start" feature where it loads on windows start so that it appears to launch faster - hence it sitting in the task tray if anyone was wondering.

9:08 pm on July 25, 2001 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 21, 1999
posts:38047
votes: 11


I'll certainly agree the latest builds are much, much better than even Mid may builds. I was surprised how much faster it was. That's comparatively speaking - I'd still call it a bloated dog slow browser here. I think the requirements for serious Moz under winders is 700mhz with at least 128 meg of ram (even then, you'll see swapping after 10-15pages - 256meg is more like it).
9:26 pm on July 25, 2001 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 21, 2001
posts:419
votes: 0


I used to test mozilla by opening freshmeat.net and going down opening each homepage in a new windows as quickly as I could, it would inevitably crash. It seems much more stable now.

I've just opened 16 windows and mem usage is 62M ram 55M swap.

The same windows opened in Opera use mem of 59M ram 68M swap.

It looks like mozilla is really starting to head in the right direction.

9:09 am on Aug 9, 2001 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 18, 2000
posts:256
votes: 0


I'm slow to reply (been busy lately), but I thought I'd kick in a little info: NS6.1 PR1 was based on Mozilla 0.9.1. NS6.1 RTM is based on a branch from Netscape 0.9.2. The open source bits of 6.1 will be released as Mozilla 0.9.2.1. As I recall, 6.1 shipped with XSLT disabled.

My advice is to skip Netscape and grab 0.9.3 unless you need/want the NS additions, such as AIM integration and the spell-checker.

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members