Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 23.22.220.37

Forum Moderators: eljefe3 & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

CJ Batch Update

Well, well ,well

     
12:52 am on Jun 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 9, 2003
posts:815
votes: 0


I just had several tranactions from 1 merchant update, going all the way back to June 1st.
I think I put way too much trust into CJ.
Did anyone else just have this happen?
4:55 pm on June 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

joined:Apr 27, 2003
posts:131
votes: 0


The most likely scenario was that this merchant reports transactions in batch, something broke on their end and it either took them a long time to realize it and/or fix it and/or catch up on the orders.

The party that you're putting your trust into is the merchant as much as, if not more than, CJ. It is in the merchant's power to screw up the reporting of transactions.

CJ and any other network does everything they can to ensure that 100% of transactions are reported. They get paid the same way you do, on performance.

This is not an uncommon occurance. Transaction reporting gets delayed, recovered, and usually all fixed up. It's annoying, even harmful, especially if you're buying traffic, but ok stuff happens.

To me, what's unacceptable is that merchants and networks tend to not talk about these things when they happen and clean up quietly with hopes that nobody notices. They want to wait until they know the good news before delivering any bad news. It can take days and of course everybody notices.

I've never, ever, seen a proactive communication that something went awry go poorly. I've seen dozens of non-communications blow into something much bigger than necessary.

11:36 pm on June 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 14, 2005
posts:324
votes: 0


Some merchants batch report one a month. Check into that. It should be listed under the program description.