Forum Moderators: skibum
Everything is open game: design, backend, GUI, payout.. you name it.
Should be interesting. If your list is longer than 10 - feel free to post.
They sent me a check for $345 when they owe me $2,000 for the month in question...Their interface is very unclear as to what I'm get paid for when...
Must mean that the majority of readers are happy with LinkShare then correct. I would have thought that there would be more of a crowd with recommending at least a few changes.
Payment delays seems to be No. 1 , but isn't there anything else you would change about the network?
When I talked to customer service, they said the latest checks are a combo of March and April payments...
I asked how I could verify that...She said there is no way to tell now and they are going to upgrade the system.
Whoever planned this transition has done a HORRIBLE job and should be fired. The fact that it is near the end of June and I'm still waiting to get paid for March is rediculous...
Things LS should change to be a decent program.
1 - Steven Messer
2 - compliance dept.
3 - get a new name, LS has been ruined.
4 - payable dept.
5 - support dept.
One thing that should never (will never) change is, they will never have my name on the customer list.
What if a third-party complience and accounting firm was utilized to handle all payables? LinkShare would be the gateway of course - but the fisical aspects would be removed from being handled inhouse.
Now, some would argue that it just adds another process which could go wrong. But before you do - the third party source is big enough not to be influenced to any degree by LinkShare. They would also be physically on the premises with offices for their operations. Please note the important distinctions between inhouse and internally.
What if that were to happen? You would receive your payments in a timely manner with full account access and reports available via the provider?
--WORMdrive
