Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.225.36.143

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

What %of visitors will see flash movies

     
1:13 am on Feb 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 1, 2006
posts:6
votes: 0


Newbie advice needed.
I want to put a 'case of the week' movie on my medical front page. If I use flash, how many visitors will not be able to see it as a movie? (97% of site visitors use IE 5.x/6.x or netscape 4.x/5.x). What flash version for the movie?
Thanks in advance,James
7:22 am on Feb 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

Full Member

joined:May 29, 2005
posts:287
votes: 0


98. something I believe is the oficial figure of the percentage of those that have flash installed.

We publish for flash player 7 as a lot still have not ugraded to 8 and I do not consider our work good enough to force them to to do so :-)

7:29 am on Feb 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 9, 2006
posts:208
votes: 0


Flash is pretty common across PC's. And the ability to download a Flash Version isn't difficult. (Especially if you offer a download.)) If your visitors want to participate in viewing your weekly movies then they should download the free flash file and enjoy.
9:22 am on Feb 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 1, 2006
posts:6
votes: 0


Many thanks, flash 7 it is then. J :-)
4:55 pm on Feb 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator lifeinasia is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Dec 10, 2005
posts:5710
votes: 89


I recommend you move the movie off the front page. Put it on another page and put a link to it on the front page. NEVER make people view a Flash image or movie! Otherwise, you'll have to be more worried about the number of people that never come back to your site.
5:12 pm on Feb 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

Full Member

joined:May 29, 2005
posts:287
votes: 0


As a developer of both flash and XHTML I have to say thats largely rubbish...

Yes of course there are a few zealots that hate everything for some reason, and flash attracts plenty of them.

Do what is right for you, and the overwhelming percentage of your visitors.

7:25 pm on Feb 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator lifeinasia is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Dec 10, 2005
posts:5710
votes: 89


I don't hate Flash- I think it's an excellent tool. However, just like any other tool, it has the potential for misuse. Such as MAKING people download a huge Flash file instead of giving them the OPTION of whether or not to view it.

Since the original poster talked of putting it on the front page, that means everyone who visits the page has to see the Flash file, whether or not they want to. It also means that every time they visit that page the Flash runs. That's only slightly worse than having a Flash intro with no working "Skip Flash intro" link. And since the poster calls it a "movie" I am assuming that means it's going to be a lot longer than just a few seconds.

7:44 pm on Feb 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 28, 2002
posts:564
votes: 0


I'm with LifeinAsia on this. I'm by no means a "Flash hater" but the steady rise of irritating Flash advertisments has lead me to disable Flash for general surfing and enable it only for items I particularly want to view.
9:06 pm on Feb 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 1, 2006
posts:6
votes: 0


Hi. Interesting comments. The sites message is that high quality cardiac imaging translates into high quality data to help patients. A case/week could be just the ticket.
In testing, I made a 750K *.avi into an 'okay' 17 frame 111x111 pixel *.fla 7 movie, (I think 80% compression) totalling 8Kb, showing an intriguing but recognisable cardiac disease. When clicked on, visitors will see the main case page.
If the rest of the homepage is tight and optimised, will I get away with it (<45k total)?
Should I put in an alternative for flash disabled visitors (overheads issue)

james :-)

9:20 pm on Feb 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 1, 2006
posts:6
votes: 0


But 8K is not perfect. How large can I go before irritating people?
james
9:50 pm on Feb 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 10, 2005
posts:78
votes: 0


Hi,

IMHO I think flash is an awesome tool. As for putting it on the front page - I don't see it as a problem as long as you have a detection script running that lets users see something if they don't have the correct flash player and also gives them the ability to download the latest if they desire.

Cheers
Kiwidesign

12:38 am on Feb 9, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:May 30, 2003
posts:728
votes: 0


But 8K is not perfect. How large can I go before irritating people?
james

As big as you want, front page or no; you just have to do it right:

I don't see it as a problem as long as you have a detection script running

This is the right approach. But add to it a short 'intro' movie that does [/i]nothing[/i] but show a control to load the movie and perhaps a key frame from the movie--it'd be good to display the file size of the movie too. You should be able to make something like this very small.

Then set it up to load the main movie when clicked. This way, the movie:

  • Fails gracefully,
  • Allows the page to load very quickly,
  • Occupies a high-visibility position
  • Annoys no-one :-)

-b

12:47 am on Feb 9, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:June 25, 2002
posts:776
votes: 0


Flash 8 has much much better quality than Flash 7. True it is not as a widespread, but the installation is seconds on a broadband connection.

The biggest reason not to go with Flash 8 is you have to pay more for the encoder.

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members