Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

Two security flaws in SP2

         

RammsteinNicCage

2:34 pm on Aug 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



From heise.de [heise.de]:

With Service Pack 2, Microsoft introduces a new security feature which warns users before executing files that originate from an untrusted location (zone) such as the Internet.

There are two flaws in the implementation of this feature: a cmd issue and the caching of ZoneIDs in Windows Explorer. The Windows command shell cmd ignores zone information and starts executables without warnings. Virus authors could use this to spread viruses despite the new security features of SP2.

Windows Explorer does not update zone information properly when files are overwritten. So it can be tricked to execute files from the internet without warning.

Well, that was fast.

Jennifer

kevinpate

3:11 pm on Aug 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Is expecting M$ to patch its own ware like asking Dracula to run the local blood bank ... cause both appear to produce two new holes
:)

Leosghost

3:15 pm on Aug 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



kevinpate :)
ROTFALOL .....

bill

7:58 am on Aug 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



winnetmag newsletter
Some German security researchers briefly held the spotlight yesterday after they claimed that they were the first to discover flaws in Microsoft's newly released and eagerly anticipated Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2) update. But Microsoft was quick to dismiss the claims, arguing that the flaws are theoretical, not actual. By late yesterday, the researchers were forced to admit that they were wrong.
...
The heise Security researchers subsequently admitted that the flaws are theoretical only and that no software code exists to exploit them.

TheDoctor

11:45 am on Aug 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



the flaws are theoretical, not actual

What the heck does this mean? Either the flaws exist or they don't. It's reminiscent of the tobacco companies' claim that the evidence for a link between smoking and lung cancer was "only statistical". It's an attempt to obfuscate sooner than face up to responsibilities.