Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

AV Pay for Inclusion Plan (part 2)

         

mr_dredd2

8:31 am on Jul 2, 2001 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



continued from Part 1 [webmasterworld.com]


Well I took the plunge on one of my url - and it's buried. It looks to me like paying for the spider doesn't get round the time delay factor in listings.

This is worrying, because if AV is spidering my homepage every week won't it CONSTANTLY be buried? And even if the time factor kicks in only when a page has been modified and not spidered, whats the point of giving AV fresh content when it will constantly be buried?

They better sort it out soon!!!

Any comments?

markd

8:55 am on Jul 2, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



My understanding is that the service (as per Ink) guarantees spidering not placement.

The position your pages achieve will be relevant to them meeting the elusive AV algo.

My concerns (as stated by myself and others in this thread) is the implications for domain filtering, the fate of 'free submissions', are pages/domains removed if not renewed after 6 months etc.
If pages already in the database were 'downgraded' or deleted the AV database would be extremely small, being populated soley by PFP pages.

mr_dredd2

9:08 am on Jul 2, 2001 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Of course, one wouldn't expect any advantage in placement for paid inclusion. But my concern with this is that paid inclusion may actually DAMAGE placement re the time factor variable.

Macguru

12:13 pm on Jul 2, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I have #1 position on AV for a low demand single keyword (11,345). Got 38 referals this month.
The same keyword is # 23 on Google (18,400). Got 1832 referals from Google alone.

I dont know of AV global market share, but those figures are no good.
I will wait too. As tedster said:

I'm concerned that I hear the sound of taps, softly playing in the distance.

JD

12:31 am on Jul 4, 2001 (gmt 0)



It has been a week since the page I submitted to the express inclusion was indexed and there has been no trace of scooter crawling any further than that page. I have 20 internal links on my page. So far I am very discouraged.

Laisha

4:04 am on Jul 4, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Forgive me if I am being dense, but are they also dropping LookSmart as their directory provider?

If you click on the "Submit a Site" link, it takes you to their wonderous Express service instead of the old LS Add URL page.

If that is the case, someone needs to notify LS, because they're still claiming AV as one of their directory "partners."

msgraph

4:17 am on Jul 4, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yeah that's true. What happened to the Looksmart deal?

I don't see it anymore.

Also I'm really scared to see a certain banner image on the submit a site link:

"New Program!.....Guaranteed Top 20 Position.....Click Here To Try It!"

ProBoost.com! Who are they? Well they are the providers of Infospider the Paid Inclusion to AV Program!!!

Call for a Quote Today!!!

Hmmm. A top company like Fujitsu is providing their name as a reference.

I think we are going to see the same as.... [webmasterworld.com...] with Inktomi

Ohhhh ho ho ho ho!

I cannot wait to see AV join the ranks of Go.com! Their sugar daddy is 900 Million in debt! The pay-to-include program or their ad deals won't help to pull them out of that.

I think the exploitation battle has just begun.

ihelpyou

12:36 pm on Jul 5, 2001 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Who are they?

Infospider=Proboost=Worldsubmit=??

===the AltaVista Express Submit Management.

That is who they are.

Word has it that Alta recently dropped ALL of Proboost's doorway and cloaked pages.

It amazes me that Alta fired up this program soooo quick like before answering ALL of the questions that they MUST of had themselves.

After 6 months pages are dropped if not renewed??

Pages in the index prior and then paying will be dropped anyway if not renewed??

Pages in for years for free will be dropped?? IF that is the case, relevance will drop dramatically if all that is in the index are PFI.

All information only pages dropped?? Even ones that make NO money on their sites??

Geezee.... I could go on and on.

Vacor

2:12 am on Jul 6, 2001 (gmt 0)



Okay, I won't take up a bunch of space with this because this is over my head, but it seems to me that if they charge for SE inclusion they will be circumventing the whole point. I mean if you're looking for info on a research topic for, say, an illness you have, or whatever.... Don't you want to get everything they can possibly find,not just paying customers??

111111

3:19 am on Jul 6, 2001 (gmt 0)



Does any one know the i.P. of the new infotech spider (altavista). Please post this if you guys know. My site has not been spidered yet.

thank you

chiyo

3:33 am on Jul 6, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



vacoor, you are right... Search engine revenue models so far are inavriably at the expense of relevancy.. the main attribute of a good search engine. Thats the paradox.

It just seems that providing search services is not just viable financially. Most are now incoporating paid enhancers, and rankings like incroprating GoTo and other PPC's. I wonder whether AV can afford to drop pages that are not paid, it is a viscious circle, theu will lose users becuase all they are getting is advertising spins on top ranks, and then they will lose advertisers and people who DO pay becuase nobody is using them.

People will continue to move to using the few places that provide relevance such as Google. And maybe Google, who need to get more revenue streams someday, by the very strength of their propularity and brand down the track will be in a position to come up with something that does not detract from their utility. Maybe even charging users for searching...

One revenue source that has not been discussed much of late is micropayments.. that lost popularity when eveyone jumped on the easier banner and ad revenue bandwagon, but if the technology can be worked out, that is one way where the good sites can make good revenue, without the need for tainting SE results. Surfers pay a small amount per use.. and Im sure that paying for valid, good data on the Web is gradually reaching commin acceptance.

User pays is really the only way that we can stop the Web becoming a mass advertising mall, that people will eventually stop taking seriously.

minnapple

3:42 am on Jul 6, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I gave up on AltaVista about six months ago because of slow or no updates.

My ears stood up when I heard that they were including pages that were submitted months ago, and thought it was time to start pay attention to them again.

Now after reading this new spidering program, I sit back and wonder WHAT'S UP NOW?

If the amount of traffic I received from AV a year ago was on the plate, I would be credit card in hand and ready to go.

I have done the LookSmart thing and was not impressed. Now what makes this any different?

"Hey Alta show us the goods in the form of a white paper."
The "Alta Vista Express Inclusion" information is elusive at best.

I am getting really tired of this pay for nothing, form of marketing.

At the amount they are charging, Print Advertising is starting to look like a better deal.
At least you know were you appear and the circulation.

minnapple

skibum

4:11 am on Jul 6, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I just happened to submit a bunch of pages about a week before the PFI program was started, and all made it in within 3 days. Then submitted a bunch more the day after the program started and they still haven't shown up. Still got some older #1 spots in AV sending traffic though.

Vacor

9:20 pm on Jul 6, 2001 (gmt 0)



Well I'm thinking the only way I'd pay to use a search engine is if my provider included a fee for this service which would mean that I would probably be using EarthLink Search engine. NO, I don't think they have one. But I hate to see that because I think that sounds very ewwwwww, I hate to say it, very AOL.

mramirez

1:40 am on Jul 7, 2001 (gmt 0)




Does anyone has tried the new AV submit service with positive results ??

Macguru, can you please tell me how you know the aprox. number of times a certain keyword is search on altavista and gogle??

makemetop

8:12 pm on Jul 7, 2001 (gmt 0)



I've tried with one page - before PFI it was at #10 for primary phrase, after I paid it moved to #8, tweaked slightly and a week later it is at #2.

JD

5:06 pm on Jul 10, 2001 (gmt 0)



After several emails to infospyider and AV I finally got an answer to my question; After submitting a url to express inclusion will scooter crawl the internal links to get relevant content?

Dear AltaVista Customer,
Thank you for choosing AltaVista. AltaVista will not crawl any part of
an URL that has been submitted using our Express Inclusion program. To
have these pages listed you will either need to submit them through
Express Inclusion or or basic submit program.
Thank you again for using AltaVista.
Regards,
AltaVista Support Team

minnapple

5:00 am on Jul 11, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



As a test I did the pay for spider for Alta (Infospider) and Ink (Position Tech). Same page for each submit.

I have the page listed on GoTo and I tweaked it for Google also.

I am going to track the ROI on each.

So . . one page - four players. A little vanilla but it should be interesting.

minnapple

minnapple

3:22 am on Jul 15, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Follow up:
Page submitted to InfoSpider on 07/08/2001

InfoSpider - Successfully indexed - 07/13/2001

"It will generally take one week for your web site's page(s) to appear in the AltaVista search results. You can then perform a search for your web page simply by going to www.AltaVista.com and entering "url:" followed by the URL of your web page in the Search entry box. AltaVista will then display your listing from the Index."

07/14/2001 - Page does not appear in the AltaVista index.

Page submitted Ink (Position Tech) on 07/09/2001.
Iwon first to update on 07/12/2001.

Page appears in position 252 under optimized keyword.
Page is being outranked by non-targeted-keyword free hosted pages. (no title, no keyword frequency, low link pop)

Previous non-paid page is position 253.
MSN and others have not updated their index to include this page.

minnapple

3:20 am on Aug 8, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Gave up on (InfoSpider) AltaVista. No tools or reports for optimizing.

(Position Tech) Inktomi. Created new page and was able to switch the spider to it.

Old page with updated title is still active and bringing in more hits, new page is peforming very well.

So far I am happy with the Ink (Position Tech) and will continue to add pages with them. Good value so far at .002 a targeted visitor. Hope to improve on this.

Altavista (InfoSpider) Logs show it has a low return on investment. Lacks the tools to to improve its return.