Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Can't decide on who to pay for...can only do one for now....

So many, and some provide results to same place....confused...

         

kstprod

11:13 am on Nov 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Ok I'm in a bit of a dilemma here and need some opinions. I launched my new commercial site on 10/22, and need some quick traffic while waiting for the big guys to pick me up. I have investigated the options but have ran into many problems. Who to pick, being #1. I accidentally got a #1 listing in MSN for a day, (by an dumb error in my part on Zeal, and yes I could have rung my own neck...)but then I was pulled. So, I know MSN traffic is decent for my keywords. However, maybe one of the other options could generate even more. Here's what I've come up with as options....

1. Google Ad Words - obviously important, but no MSN
2. Fast/All the Web - not sure, but yes MSN
3. Lycos In Site Select - not sure but yes MSN (same as FAST? confused...)
4. Overture - obviously important
5. Inktomi - not sure, but yes MSN and others
6. Looksmart Listings - not sure but yes MSN and others
7. Ask Jeeves - not really in the running, but can't leave him out
8. Altavista - haven't heard good things, usually free works?

Ok, now I know some of these are PPC and some are PFI, and some provide results for same places, and I don't really care either way. I have read SEW, and others, and just feel that I need actual experienced people to help, not just an article. I have an extra $50 and need to get *decent* amount of traffic going while I play the waiting game with the realllly big ones. Any suggestions guys?

Sincerely,

Confused and in Limbo..(aka kstprod) :)

fathom

11:42 am on Nov 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



hmmm... on a limited budget I would start looking a little closer to home (locally).

One of the biggest disadvantages of search engines/directories (the big ones and particularily with PPC) is that geographic "local" click-throughs are difficult to predict.

Unless you can distribute internationally (physical products that is) a good chunk of your money (PPC) can go to "untargeted clicks" simply because shipping can be very expensive to send everywhere/anywhere.

If you have already considered this... extremely targeted Google Adwords maybe the best choice (short of another member indicating another engine/directory can better target your specific niche).

Receptional

12:10 pm on Nov 4, 2002 (gmt 0)



If your site is new, I would consider the "hidden benefits" of PPC over PFI. Namely ROI measurement. Let me explain.

The biggest problem for most new sites is deciding how much you can afford to invest in getting each new visitor and still make a profit. As PFI will spread your traffic over a year, it is hard to measure how much a visitor costs. PPC (especialliy Overture who seems to ber tracking well) gives you instant data (well, within 24 hours) of how much each visitor is actuually costing.

Once you have some "converted" traffic, you can say right, I made "X" dollars yesterday from Overture visitors and there were "Y" visitors. This means that I can afford to spen "Z" on each visitor.

If the bidding on Overture is too steep for your math, then you either need to improve your conversion rate or watch the other bidder as they go bankrupt.

Dixon.

kstprod

12:14 pm on Nov 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



fathom,

Thank you for responding. I do work with international folks as well. I don't ship anything, I merely provide a service, so the geographics part in the decision doesn't apply to me, I don't think.

I too, had considered AdWords as my best possibility, but with only $50, and my 3 word keyword phrase (which is very targeted), at last check had a minimum bid of $0.81 cents per click, would mean that I would not get very far in terms of time. Which blows my mind because on Overture, the #1 spot can be achieved with approx. $0.18. What also concerned me is, what would prevent a competitor from using up all of the few clicks I would have?

I seem to prefer PFI, as opposed to PPC, but would scratch that preference if it meant getting more valuable traffic. So, basically I'm back at zero with no idea what to do.

.....Oh my god I am so indecicive..... :(

Thanks again for your input and time!

Karen

kstprod

12:19 pm on Nov 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Receptional,

Thank you also, for your input. That does make alot of sense, however, considering my previous post, do you agree that your advice would still apply? Speaking in terms of the high bid amounts?

Karen

fathom

12:36 pm on Nov 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



kstprod give this thread a few days to run... with the diversity of members here, there are bound to be some very innovative ideas.

In addition, you need to get over that pessimistic point of view! :)

It's all about risk management "yes" but thinking you only have $50 means you don't intend on having any sales even before you start.

In the military there is a saying: "If a man believes he is going to die tomorrow... he will usually find a way to do it".

Sound advice... in any profession! :)

It may be a very limited budget but $50 can turn into $100, and then $200, and so on, in a very short time if some percentage of sales is turned back into advertising.

Receptional

12:47 pm on Nov 4, 2002 (gmt 0)



Kwai Chang Cane (kung Fu) could learn some philosophy from Fathom! :)

<on Overture, the #1 spot can be achieved with approx. $0.18>

Well - for my money .18 is MUCH better value than .81 from Google. Since you only pay per visitor, then I would say Overture makes sense - for now.

I would say that in the long run PFI is generally a better bet than PPC but in the early days, it is all about knowing how to make a profit, and knowing how to make a profit is all about measuring. PPC measures like nothing on earth, If you can't make it pay at 18 cents per visitor, then you won't make it pay at 81 cents per visitor. What's more, if you can't make it pay at 18 cents per visitor you have to ask yourself "what will it pay at, and is there a realistic way to get enough traffic to buy that dream house at such a low CPV (cost per visitor).

Dixon.

born2drv

11:26 pm on Nov 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



If you have only $50 to invest, I would not spend a penny more than $0.05/click, even if you are #20. You need a decent sample space to determine your conversion rate. I would target at least 50 or so highly targetted niche terms on Overture for no more than $0.05/click. Once you go through half of your spend, (500 visitors), you should have a good idea of what sells and why. Make some small tweaks to the site based on the feedback of those 500 (if possible) and observe the next 500 visitors and conversions, if things go well, bid up accordingly.

But to be honest, $50 is not that big a budget to start from scratch so you want to spend as little as possible and focus only on the most targetted and cheap visitors first. I try to get at LEAST 10,000 visitors before trying anything knew to determine trends because you need a decent sample space to factor out other anomolies.

Also, if it's a service you're offering, consider getting 1) an 800#, and 2) PPC management software. You can configure the software in such a way that it will bid down for you after hours you specify, so that most of your visitors will only come to your site (and call) during times you're open.

Good luck.

kstprod

3:32 pm on Nov 5, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thank you guys very much for the insight. I think I 'might' be able to use just a tad more patience in my decision, because I am now being deep crawled by Google, and if that means that I will probably be included in the next update, then that might scratch AdWords from my options, I know, depending on my rankings. Not TOO much keyword competition, so I don't feel the need to have both a high rank and AdWords.

I think I better hold off on deciding quite yet. (Which, if I know myself, then I will probly be impatient and decide anyway in a few days...lol) Anyway, I really appreciate the feedback from you guys! Thanks for the attitude adjustment fathom! ;)

Karen

Mike_Mackin

3:46 pm on Nov 5, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>on Overture, the #1 spot can be achieved with approx. $0.18

What is the #3 spot?
What is your gross profit?

nell

4:52 pm on Nov 5, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The best ROI for 50 bucks?
Spend the 50 bucks on throw-away doorway domains and spam them everywhere.
Your fat wallet competitors do it as well as spending on everything else you can't afford.

Dante_Maure

11:56 pm on Nov 5, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



on Overture, the #1 spot can be achieved with approx. $0.18. What also concerned me is, what would prevent a competitor from using up all of the few clicks I would have?

Not bidding for the top spot is the best way to avoid this.

You'll attract much fewer clicks from competitors if you go with the #3 spot while still achieving page one results on most Overture partner sites.

Many people have observed a much greater ROI on the lower positions for a number of reasons...

- Less illegitimate clicks
- Lower cost per click
- Serious buyers tend to click more than just the top result

Only your own testing will tell the tale for your specific keywords and site.

bobmark

10:04 pm on Nov 8, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Since this started with both PPC and PPI, my experience is - even with the losses of AOL etc - Inktomi will deliver some traffic (at about...say...15% of the volume a good Google position will).
I have Insite Select too and that hardly generates enough traffic to cover the modest cost.
I am assuming your budget is limited to the point you are talking about paying for including your home/entry page only. Inktomi has recently begun pretty regular semi-deep crawling of "unpaid" pages but I have no idea to what degree paid inclusion factors into this.