Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

new ink question

I used ink's paid inclusion and my aol ranking tanked

         

timotter

12:10 am on Mar 7, 2002 (gmt 0)



I used inktomis paid inclusion 2 days ago on a couple of pages that had been ranked in aol search in the mid 50's so not a great ranking. I heard that paid inclusion would help rankings so I tried it with a couple of pages. But now I can't find my site period. Was this a mistake? Can it be fixed?
If I were to send Ink a bill for poor performance would I get a #1 ranking.

Marcia

1:12 am on Mar 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Welcome to the board, timotter.

Where did you check to find your pages? The Ink partners update within different timeframes, I've found that MSN is generally the first. Check here: for straight Intomi search [169.207.238.189].

In view of other recent developments that have just surfaced, let me ask you this - is your site also listed in Looksmart and/or ODP?

stcrim

2:41 am on Mar 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



timotter

I have made the same mistake you did as have many other people.

INK claims that paying for a page will not trash your free pages. BUT THAT HASN'T BEEN MY EXPERIENCE...

-s-

flyingpep

2:56 am on Mar 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I usually just go by the pure search to see where I stand on Ink. What aol or msn does with the data is out of their hands.

rcjordan

3:01 am on Mar 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Welcome to wmw, flyingpep.

flyingpep

3:10 am on Mar 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well thanks :)

caine

3:29 am on Mar 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I always find Inks algo, weird, because what ever it denotes as positives and negatives of a page, are way out from Google, Fast, Wisenut and AV.

Some of the weirdest pages come up, though at the Barcon, certain individuals suggested written pages specifically for ink !

jatar_k

4:04 am on Mar 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member



we have reeeeeally good results with ink paid inclusion. I wouldn't neglect it. Tags matching content works well.

as we all know, content is king.

There are always pages that ink doesn't like, we usually give it a little time and then sub other pages for ones that don't get good clickthroughs.

timotter

4:20 am on Mar 7, 2002 (gmt 0)



Marcia: My site is listed in ODP but not Looksmart, I am trying to find the cheap route first if I can. I went to the straight Inktomi search like you suggested and one of the pages I listed is there the other isn't.

Stcrim How long did it take for your listings to get back to where they were before?

thanks for all the suggestions though

Marcia

5:33 am on Mar 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



timotter, if it's only a couple of days, give it a bit more and check at the site of the company you submitted through. It should tell about the inclusion, and if there's still a problem write to them - the company, not Ink.

>one of the pages I listed is there the other isn't.

Give it several days and check by domain at AOL and MSN as well as pure search.. I'd just like to point out a simple difference between those two, in case your pages turn up there. I had two pages from a site in, paralleled with some cross-over in keywords, although I attempted to optimize them for different keywords - each one for one of the two best. At MSN they both appeared for searches, one right after the other - in pure search as well. Yet, with AOL, one page ONLY came up for each of the two keyword phrases, not the two of them as with MSN.

I noticed this phenomenon and tweaked page #1 a bit more for the phrase emphasized on #2. In a couple of days, page #1 showed up at AOL for both searches, moving up from #11 to #7 for phrase #2 with no loss for phrase #1. You could no longer find page #2 for phrase #2 at AOL, it had been replaced there by #1. At that point, for all practical purposes, 2 pages were no longer needed, only 1 was. MSN seems to show both, AOL does not seem to show both together. I've seen the same thing on a second site with two pages that are optimized for two different phrases that are close - MSN shows both, AOL only one for each phrase.

Sorry, please forgive all the repetition. I just wanted to make sure it was clear without naming specific keyword phrases and thought it was worth pointing out with respect to AOL for anyone with a similar situation who might see something similar.

This only reflects a limited "experiment" (which also is the case with site I've got in BOW that I just checked) and might possibly not apply at all in other cases. And it should also be qualified by saying that this is not by any means even near being a competitive category, although it does bring steady niche traffic. It's not likely that this would occur with anything considered competitive; I've got no idea, it's not within my experience to do "competitive" with Ink, just targeted niche type stuff, so it's certainly not informative beyond that.

timotter

1:39 am on Mar 8, 2002 (gmt 0)



thanks Marcia

stcrim

3:17 am on Mar 8, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



timotter

My listing have never come back. And unless Ink wakes up and decides that's not a good way to treat PAYING customers I doubt they will come back...

-s-

Jill

10:01 pm on Mar 12, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I usually just go by the pure search to see where I stand on Ink.

Where do we find pure Ink results these days? I dumped my paid pages as they never did anything at all and were buried too deep to ever be found in search. I want to see what I still have in the database.

john316

10:20 pm on Mar 12, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Here ya go...good luck.

[169.207.238.189...]

Jill

10:35 pm on Mar 12, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well what's showing in the "pure search" is 2 of my paid pages are still in, for the time being I'm sure - and still buried. The only other page in the database is our size charts ;) A whole lotta good that will do us. Now to figure out how to get more in, and if it's even worth the trouble at this point.