Forum Moderators: open
Our clients are flocking to Overture by the droves. It puts them above the directory listings and gives them control.
We have one client who raises their BIDS in the morning and when they have all their staff can handle they lower them. And they do this though out the day.
With many pages paid for and listed in the top 10 of INK they still could get enough traffic in a week to keep one person busy for 2 hours.
Question - is anyone getting any any substantial traffic from MSN as a result of having paid for their pages to be spidered? And if so, is it for anything with competitive terms?
-s-
If you're unfortunate enough to be in, say, the travel or hotel business, you're screwed right off the bat by Microsoft's notoriously monopolistic business practices with the presence of Expedia's offerings in vivid 3D color right at the very top of the listings (pictures and all).
In competitive categories, save your $299 at Look$mart, and get 2 or 3 paid pages (if by chance you're one of the few who can get a page to rank well in INK under competitive terms) to cover the remaining INK partners like AOL (which has huge potential). If you can afford to play the Overture game it's probably a sure thing.
For anything vaguely competitive, MSN has all but assassinated the little guys. Imagine that, huh.
Obviously, Ink results are also PFP, but they still (just) reflect relevance to the search. Through a combination of Looksmart listings and Ink pages, traffic from MSN is almost starting to compete with Yahoo.
I suppose it depends on the search term, but for me Overture syndicated results nearly always reflect the 'usual suspects' - once the novelty wears off, where is the value of that for the searcher?
I do feel that if you are in a very competitive market like travel or hotels then Overture is crucial, but maybe the importance of search engines as the No.1 promotional tool may wain in the future. Maybe it's time for us all to broaden our online promotional mix?