Forum Moderators: open
Concentrate on 1 or 2 keywords per page; try maximum 5/6 words within your title and a good description.
Others have found similar problems with index pages.
And - think of each page for ink as a separate country that must stand on its own. Links, themes and all the other stuff does not apply to ink.
The worst possible doorway page with kws in comment tags and the whole bit is more likely to rank well than a well made content filled page that GOOGLE so loves.
If you can dig up some of the adult spam from a couple of years ago and do what they did - then pay ink you will be amazed at how well you rank in "pure ink".
The only thing I can think is that MSN - AOL and the others must be paying ink bargin basement prices for search results.
-s-
I've been seeing that my sites that rank well with Google do so with Inktomi too. I thought it was due to link popularity, for the top ranking pages don't have extensive on-page optimization.
Any ideas as to what else ink likes?
4eyes may be on to something with the above post. My hand full of paid pages are like little islands with no links to anything but each other. They are templates with only the kws changed on each - and they rank very well - that is, under the directory and GOTO listings (what a bunch of junk - pages that rank #1 in ink but may be #50 in the results under directory and goto - and to think, I paid for that)
-s-
I've got pages showing under a category with a total of 238,377 search results returned, with only 3 directory listings in the category - a good show of it's non-popularity, isn't it?
Here's what I've got:
#6 at MSN, without 3 directory listings equivalent to # 3 if it were pure Ink, an internal page in the root directory of an UNPAID site.
#7 at MSN, without 3 directory listings equivalent to # 4 if it were pure Ink, the index page of a /directory/ containing a keyword, in a PAID site. Same search term as the previous.
The main index page of the PAID site is in the 60's for a search term because it's got lousy optimization for that phrase. But it has not been "purged." Neither has the index page of the UNPAID site been "purged", which is right near the other for the same search phrase - in the 60's, not really optimized at all, not deserving of any more, to be honest. Neither one is, for that phrase.
The index page of the UNPAID site is # 1 for the keyphrase it's optimized for. Has been for ages, and I wouldn't give you ten bucks for it, for all the traffic it gets. But it's "sleepers" like this that kind of show what Ink is all about, so who can complain?
What's the point? My unpaid page has been in there forever, seems to be what's called "bullet-proof" and does proportionately according to how relevant it is according to Ink criteria. I can't really see how the paid pages do any differently, it seems to depend on what I do with them. They're all still in there. Totally worthless for traffic, but "in there." :)
Forget submitting index pages under the PFI
>Then I wonder what would be an ideal candidate if the index page is so vital
That used to be the case with inktomi not anymore, create a doorway for ink pay for that to be included and so long as you've got your page correct you should get a half decent ranking for it.
My experience with ink is it's all the title & description