What do we do when a group of Grocer’s Apo’strophe’s trie’s to invade the party?
not2easy
10:33 pm on Aug 17, 2023 (gmt 0)
They're not welcome and will need to take their car's and bicycle's back on the road's.
tangor
12:28 am on Aug 18, 2023 (gmt 0)
' (removes a letter ... I just removed my post.)
Martin Potter
8:17 pm on Aug 18, 2023 (gmt 0)
Then there was the Canadian CBC television news editor who got confused about the obvious differences between plural and possessive senses, complicated by the unnatural "sound" of a particular name in the possessive sense. Concerning the wildfire that is now threatening the residents of Yellowknife in our Northwest Territories, the editor approved a screen caption that mentioned "Yellowknives residents ..." Another win for the apostrophobes.
lucy24
1:02 am on Aug 19, 2023 (gmt 0)
:: idly wondering if the said CBC editor roots for the Maple Leaves ::
blend27
9:33 pm on Aug 21, 2023 (gmt 0)
I've been saying - People should just switch to square brackets. all along.... Much easier when 'doin' cut and pasting...
Too many versions of Apostrophes: Single Squiggly, Double Squiggly, Left Double Curly tick and s``t..
Left along most people can[t] even spell the word Apostrophes[i know i get it wrong half the time].
or Just say TICK!
lucy24
10:28 pm on Aug 21, 2023 (gmt 0)
The really exasperating thing is that the possessive apostrophe has absolutely no historical or etymological justification anyway. It’s just a byproduct of a 17th-century folk etymology involving “his”. (Weirder still, someone in Germany must have thought this was a brilliant notion, because you'll see the occasional 19th-century work putting wholly spurious apostrophes in front of the genitive s.) </rant>