Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.157.81.13

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL & lawman

California 1st to Allow Driverless Cars

     
10:38 pm on Oct 11, 2017 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator keyplyr is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 26, 2001
posts:9869
votes: 515


Completely driverless cars could hit California roads as early as next June, if not sooner
[washingtonpost.com...]

The California Department of Motor Vehicles just proposed a revised set of regulations that will allow self-driving cars to operate without a driver behind the wheel.
On the federal level, the House of Representatives in September unanimously approved the Self Drive Act, which would allow automakers to deploy 25,000 self-driving cars in the first year, a number that would rise to 100,000 over a three-year time span
[businessinsider.com...]
1:09 am on Oct 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tangor is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 29, 2005
posts:7827
votes: 538


The beginning of the end approaches. :)

The future is control of all transportation (hopefully a few decades from now!) Wonder how many will be off the grid when that happens?

One of those beware what you ask for you just might get it kind of things. When autonomous cars take over transportation who will have private ownership and how can gubermints tax all that lost private property revenue? Labor unions will scream foul. A zillion jobs lost by inches then miles. A new future coming soon. Sadly, it won't be the Jetson's version of the family flitter.
8:21 am on Oct 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:24605
votes: 588


You're correct, tangor, but it's up to the gubermints, as you put it, to work that out. You can be sure they will be looking at where tax income is going to come from in the light of these developments.

There's no doubt, it's going to be a challenging time to make it work for society.

When this first significant roll out reaches California it'll be a real-world test. Hopefully, it won't be just be yet another adding to the already busy roads.
5:53 pm on Oct 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator keyplyr is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 26, 2001
posts:9869
votes: 515


Totally disagree. I see nothing that would indicate a Gov't take-over of private transportation. Sorry, that smells of conspiracy theory.

[edited by: lawman at 10:51 pm (utc) on Oct 12, 2017]

6:21 pm on Oct 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator lifeinasia is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Dec 10, 2005
posts:5702
votes: 88


You can be sure they will be looking at where tax income is going to come from in the light of these developments.
Yup- raise taxes on drivered cars to force people to go driverless (and optionally make drivered cars illegal to operate- call it a "safety" issue). Then, once they suddenly realize all the revenue from those taxes has dried up (since no one is driving any more), quickly raise the taxes on driverless cars to make up for it. At least that's the way we do things here in California.

When this first significant roll out reaches California it'll be a real-world test.
Using "California" and "real-world" in the same sentence- now THAT's funny! (Or would be if it weren't so sad...)
6:38 pm on Oct 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:June 20, 2006
posts:1957
votes: 32


Transportation will become easier and cheaper for everyone (which includes a lot of folk). Yes, some pockets of activity will be negatively impacted - change always does that. But overall, increased prosperity will spread to everyone in far greater amounts, than the suffering in certain corners.
10:56 pm on Oct 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lucy24 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 9, 2011
posts:14151
votes: 541


It didn't take long to figure out they were asking the wrong question at the beginning. It isn’t “How can the human test pilot safely override the automation?” Instead, it’s “How can we prevent passengers from taking control of the vehicle?”

Wide range of futures, here. Envision a world in which the very term “driverless vehicle” is as comically old-fashioned as “horseless carriage”. Envision a US in which the solution to great numbers of driving-license applicants failing some aspect of the road test is not simply to eliminate that part of the test--because you can no longer say that driving is a necessity of adult life. Car, yes. Driving, no. What happens to state laws that currently allow people as young as 14 to get driving licenses under restricted circumstances? (Exactly how restricted depends on the state.)

How old will the passengers have to be? Old enough to drive? Old enough to babysit? (Not explicitly codified in the US.)

But gosh, those little cars sure are cute aren't they.
4:19 am on Oct 13, 2017 (gmt 0)

Moderator This Forum from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator lawman is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 28, 2001
posts:3600
votes: 62


Endangered species:
Municipalities whose existence depends upon traffic fines
Speed traps
DUI/DWI lawyers
Traffic court
Personal injury lawyers
Traffic enforcement units of police departments
Road rage
Gasoline stations
The thrill of driving around in a car with loud pipes and way too much horsepower
4:27 am on Oct 13, 2017 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator keyplyr is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 26, 2001
posts:9869
votes: 515


Endangered species:
The thrill of driving around in a car with loud pipes and way too much horsepower
nah
8:22 am on Oct 13, 2017 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:24605
votes: 588


Endangered species:

Truck and bus drivers.
Train drivers.

Tax is one of the challenges I see. In simple terms: If you have a job you pay tax, and if you're a cab driver that loses their job because of automation, the cab driver isn't paying tax. That results in less income to the state, and therefore, less for social welfare. The cab driver has less income so they spend less, which results in less income for the state and social welfare.

nah

Agreed - that won't change for quite a while yet for those that enjoy it. :)
8:12 pm on Oct 13, 2017 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lucy24 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 9, 2011
posts:14151
votes: 541


which results in less income for the state

Oh, great. Another excuse for California to claim they simply can’t afford to rank better than 48th in per-capita spending on {important function of your choice}.
 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members