Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 107.23.176.162

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Fans demand 'Lemmium' periodic table tribute

     
3:15 am on Jan 7, 2016 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tangor is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 29, 2005
posts:9047
votes: 752


Inevitably, and agreeably, an online petition is demanding that one of the four heavy metal elements coming soon to an engorged periodic table near you be named "Lemmium", in honour of recently departed Motörhead frontman Ian Fraser Kilmister, aka Lemmy.

The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) has admitted elements 113, 115, 117, and 118 to the table's seventh row, and the various laboratories involved in their discovery have the privilege of proposing permanent titles for the newcomers.

As we noted earlier this week, the last official dubbing back in 2012 resulted in elements 114 and 116 being christened flerovium and livermorium, after Russia's Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

This, we suggested, showed a dismal lack of imagination, and readers responded with some inventive ideas for Messrs 113, 115, 117, and 118.

Simon Harris quickly got his pitch in for element 115, for which "as a super-heavy metal, Kilmisterium would be a fitting tribute". Anonymous Custard replied: "Only if it changes to Lemmium after a few years without anyone knowing who came up with the new name or why..."

Uncanny. While IUPAC's Inorganic Chemistry Division has the final say on names, the man behind the Lemmium petition reckons the moniker's legit because "an astrological object (a star) has been named Lemmy to meet the IUPAC naming recommendations".


No link, that's all there is, apologies to The Register [ [theregister.co.uk...] the full site link] for this curator placement. For more re: the individual named see earlier report here: [webmasterworld.com...]
2:40 pm on Jan 7, 2016 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:June 12, 2004
posts:125
votes: 7


Personally I don't believe this is right, if we are going to name elements after dead musicians surely "Lennonolium" , "Hendrixium", "Preslium" and "Beethovium" should be of higher priority. Even "Sinatrium" would have a greater claim in terms of popularity.

We will never discover enough new elements to honour all our dead musicians this way. It is safer to stick with stars, asteroids etc. the supply will be less finite.
3:03 pm on Jan 7, 2016 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:25843
votes: 847


I'm with Old Honky on this. I suspect that social media bandwagon will put pressure on to take that step, but, as OH says, there are many, many others that are also justified.

As this is foo, I was thinking that we ought to discuss the attributes of the proposed elements from OH.

For example,
Sinatrium, part of Lanthanides, and they are all in the same group as Bogartium, Martinium, Davisinium, etc. and have the tendency to remain attracted to the base, commonly known RatPackLasVegasinium.

hehehe
 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members