Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 18.104.22.168
Forum Moderators: open
One of the primary drivers of the growth in organic food sales over the last couple of decades is the perception that organic food is healthier than conventionally farmed food.
It stands to reason, doesn’t it? After all conventional crops depend on chemicals and organic food doesn't.
And we all know that chemicals, in this case mainly pesticides, are bad for you. Ergo organic food should be healthier, and the strong growth in organic food sales (up 2.8 per cent last year, after a few years of downturn during the recession) attests to how popular opinion has accepted this assertion.
This is why the results of a new UK study that looked at cancer risk and the consumption of organic food is so damned inconvenient. Where organic food advocates have pushed organics as a way of reducing cancer risk, the study shows that it makes little difference one way or another. Hence uncomfortable headlines from the likes of the Daily Mail: Eating organic foods does NOTHING to reduce the cancer risk among women, says new study.
And we all know that chemicals... are bad for you.
Nowadays you see "organic" pesto and while it contains only organic grown ingredients, the pine nuts are replaced with cheap cashew, the olive oil replaced with cheaper undefined oils, and it containts potato flakes instead of parmesan cheese.
Surely, that should not be labelled Pesto!
joined:Apr 13, 2002
FWIW, the SUN causes cancer, yet without enough SUN you suffer from vitamin D deficiency.