Forum Moderators: open
Thanks in advance.
sounds like windows, buggering around. Bascially not a clean format of the partition, something me and my brother picked up on a few years ago. Re-do the format, but change the size of the partition only by mb's though, that should clear the problem.
If its not that, then you may need to sort out the linux side of the dual boot first.
Seriously, if it's a new installation and you don't have anything on it but the Windows install (and don't want to keep the Linux partition), the easiest approach is probably to just run fdisk. It should detect all of the partitions and let you delete any you don't need and reallocate the space to the one you want. Then reformat and reinstall.
.then installed duel boot suse 8.0
.removed windows and used entirley for linux
.now waiting on new machine to run linux on
.wish to use the old box (one with problem) entirely for win 98
What i did was insert win 98 cd rom in machine and followeed install procedure. I assume that doing this wouls remove linux from the disk or at least alow it to be over written. Now when i select properties from c drive it seams to think i only have 550 meg of hard disk.
Sorry about the confusion, i was getting the questions crossed over within the thread.
Thanks again.
1. dir the floppy make sure that you have a) fdisk, b) format, and if you have an old PC, you may need to run the setup.exe, as the dr-rom/masterboard may not have the auto-reg bios to force the cd-rom onto the system.
2. load up fdisk, then delete all partitions.
3. reboot, load up format c:, this takes forever, tea time!
4. reboot, fdisk and partition which ever way you wish using primary as main, then logicals and extended's for virtual hdd's on the c: notes on fdisk, are quite good.
5. reboot, put 98 cdrom into drive, and load setup.exe, if the d:/ is not present, reboot with the floppy and run setup.exe of a:, then ramdisk will load, and load generic drivers for the cdrom, and then you should be able to go from their on your full disk with a 98 setup.
Do linux and Windows not use different storage things? Windows being FAT16/32, and linux being ... something else.
Yup. Windows uses fat16/32 or NTFS for newer versions. Linux canonically uses ext2, though it can do perfectly well on others, including ext3 (journalling update of ext2), ReiserFS (another journaling fs), and JFS (another journaling FS). It can also read and write many other filesystems, including FAT and NTFS variations, though they can't be the primary file system that Linux runs from, and there have in the past been issues with Linux write support to NTFS volumes. Those may have been resolved since I last paid attention to them - I don't do Windoze, so I pay little attention to the state of the filesystem drivers for those formats. There are also hacks to pretend that a FAT filesystem supports some of the features needed to run Linux, and there at least used to be distributions that used them to avoid having to repartition your drive. I've never used one, and they have a reputation as a headache.