Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 23.20.239.237

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL & lawman

Message Too Old, No Replies

Site Blacklist Law Takes Force In Russia

     
12:25 pm on Nov 1, 2012 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:22825
votes: 304


A law that aims to protect children from harmful internet content by allowing the government to take sites offline has taken effect in Russia.

The authorities are now able to blacklist and force offline certain websites without a trial.Site Blacklist Law Takes Force In Russia [bbc.co.uk]


If the websites themselves cannot be shut down, internet service providers (ISPs) and web hosting companies can be forced to block access to the offending material.
1:15 pm on Nov 1, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from MY 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member vincevincevince is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 1, 2003
posts:4847
votes: 0


I've come to change my mind on this issue. I'm starting to see fairly clearly that the Internet does need centralised blocking of offensive material and action against offenders at national and international level. Without this, the Internet we value for so much will remain a hazard. It's kind of like the transformation of a frontier town into a civilized place...
5:32 pm on Nov 1, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:May 8, 2003
posts:1141
votes: 0


does need centralised blocking of offensive material and action against offenders at national and international level.

Yes, especially material offending current governments. It is outrageous how the russian opposition is trying to influence even children to vote against the ruling party once they are eligible to vote. Poisening their minds with ideas of free speech, democracy, rule of law and stuff like that. Finally websites in Russia can be blocked without judicial oversight.
6:01 pm on Nov 1, 2012 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator incredibill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 25, 2005
posts:14646
votes: 93


The internet wasn't built for children, get them off the web. The first payment gateway, the foundation of ecommerce, was originally built because the pornographers needed a way to take credit cards online. It was all there BEFORE the children were ever allowed on the internet or even knew what the internet was.

There is already technology out there that parents can install that protects the children by whitelisting authorized sites just for children and blocks everything else so this type of legislation has no purpose except to give government an excuse to shut any site down that they don't like.

FWIW, that's how this crap always happens is someone wraps an issue around "protecting the children" and the next thing you know the RIAA misuses such laws to take lyric sites offline because those explicit lyrics could harm the children.
2:38 am on Nov 2, 2012 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 17, 2004
posts:217
votes: 0


Damn, can't the gov just do all the parenting for me? I hate to talk to my children, protect them and teach them.

Plz gov, do it for me! You are so much smarter and better than me; I really need you to micro manage every possible aspect of life.
11:30 am on Nov 4, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from LK 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 16, 2005
posts:2485
votes: 30


vince, actually, I think the reduction in governement censorship in other areas (books, theatre, etc.) is usually regarded as an advance for civilisation.

If you want centralised censorship of the internet, why not centralised censorship of everything else. After all some of the some of the things currently effectively blocked on the net (e.g. the record cover image on Wikipedia that was banned in the UK) are often available through other channels (e.g. buy a physical copy).
6:39 pm on Nov 4, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 16, 2004
posts:1341
votes: 0


...and China has ordered carrier pigeon owners to not fly the birds during the upcoming 18th Congress when the country's new leader will take over --

Potentially sinister threats to China's ruling Communist Party sit unnoticed in cages perched on a rooftop above a small alleyway in southwestern Beijing. Not dissidents. Pigeons.

A week before the party's all-important congress opens, China's stability-obsessed rulers are taking no chances and have combed through a list all possible threats, avian or otherwise.

[timesofindia.indiatimes.com...]
 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members