I think it is a great concept: store all sorts of private data for sharing among government agencies, and have the visitors pay for it themselves! Oh, and use the money to "promote tourism"! </sarcasm>
BeeDeeDubbleU
12:23 pm on Aug 11, 2010 (gmt 0)
The fee has been introduced to fund a programme which aims to promote tourism in the US and attract foreign spending.
Sorry? Promote tourism?
Rugles
3:31 pm on Aug 11, 2010 (gmt 0)
Certainly seems counter-productive. You would think they would just be happy that people are bringing in hard currency when they visit.
LifeinAsia
3:35 pm on Aug 11, 2010 (gmt 0)
Yeah, we do things backwards here in the States. To try to get more people to come, we obviously charge more. (Los Angeles is trying to do the same thing- get an additional transient tax added to hotel bills and use that money to promote L.A. as a destination.)
Most likely, it's going to backfire (ya think?!), plus other countries will start charging (or increasing their fees) for U.S. tourists.
engine
3:41 pm on Aug 11, 2010 (gmt 0)
Governments around the world are looking for new ways to raise much needed revenue.
I'm not in the least bit surprised about this charge, but, I do find it questionable about it being to promote tourism. If they'd come out and said it's to cover admin of the system, then, I think i'd believe it a little more.
Rugles
3:53 pm on Aug 11, 2010 (gmt 0)
added to hotel bills and use that money to promote L.A. as a destination
This practice is not limited to the US.
john_k
4:01 pm on Aug 11, 2010 (gmt 0)
Los Angeles is trying to do the same thing- get an additional transient tax added to hotel bills and use that money to promote L.A. as a destination.
In my area the city council has seriously considered an "axle tax" for entering the city. Thankfully it has not (yet) gained enough traction to actually put it up for a vote.
LifeinAsia
4:26 pm on Aug 11, 2010 (gmt 0)
They might be smarter trying to tax people LEAVING the city.
Oops- didn't mean to give them any ideas!
roycerus
6:22 pm on Aug 11, 2010 (gmt 0)
It's bad - but they are cashing in on the idea that people will not back out of visiting for a $14 charge.
Samizdata
7:10 pm on Aug 11, 2010 (gmt 0)
They might be smarter trying to tax people LEAVING the city
Many years ago I visited a country that levied an exit tax.
The sum was tiny, it was one of the poorest countries on Earth, and I had a great time there, so I didn't mind - but I always wondered what would have happened if I had been unwilling or unable to pay.
...
caribguy
7:20 pm on Aug 11, 2010 (gmt 0)
They might be smarter trying to tax people LEAVING the city.
It's done here... Twenty bucks a head, ka-ching! There used to be a separate payment booth at the airport, now airlines incorporate it in the price of a ticket.
Rugles
8:19 pm on Aug 11, 2010 (gmt 0)
Cuba has an exit tax too. I want to say it was $20 as well. You have to pay it before you get to the departure lounge so I am sure there would be no way out of it.