Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Satellites Collide

         

engine

2:57 pm on Feb 12, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Satellites Collide [news.bbc.co.uk]
US and Russian communications satellites have collided in space in what is thought to be the biggest incident of its kind to date.

The US commercial Iridium spacecraft hit a defunct Russian satellite at an altitude of about 800km (500 miles) over Siberia on Tuesday, Nasa said.

The risk to the International Space Station and a shuttle launch planned for later this month is said to be low.

The impact produced a cloud of debris, which will be tracked into the future.

mack

6:15 pm on Feb 14, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I always wondered what happened to satalites once their useage timespan had been served. Now I know, they crash into each other!

Surely this is somethign that is going to become more common as more and more satalites and probes are placed in orbit.

Mack.

wildbest

6:29 pm on Feb 14, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I always wondered what happened to satalites once their useage timespan had been served.

I always thought it's just like what happens to somebody's expensive car once their useage timespan had been served. They usually try to 'sell' what's left to their insurance company. ;)

Essex_boy

6:57 am on Feb 16, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Expensive prang !

netchicken1

7:09 am on Feb 16, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It might not be as accidental as you think.

Firstly all satellites are tracked, the Russian one changed course not long before the accident. Also the chances of two satellites hitting each other are so remote that it was not considered an issue until now.

Pentagon brass, satellite industry executives and NASA leaders for years have publicly expressed concern about the dangers of orbital debris. But the odds of a direct hit between satellites were considered so small as to be basically unthinkable. The ground-based and space-based reconnaissance tools available to the Pentagon generally were considered adequate to keep close track of larger objects

The Russian craft was being monitored by Pentagon organizations that keep track of space debris in order to prevent in-orbit collisions from damaging or destroying both commercial and government satellites.

The Pentagon didn't miss it, the Russian satellite changed course 'randomly' to exactly hit the other one.

Two car sized objects 'accidentally' hit in the immenseness of spacial orbit, one being a russian military satellite, the other being used by the US military for communications (Iridium) Its a bit like a bullet hitting a bullet, or two shells hitting each other.

coincidence?
really?

lawman

9:55 am on Feb 16, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Russian one changed course not long before the accident

Cite?

Syzygy

2:39 pm on Feb 16, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Satellites collide;

* submarines collide [news.bbc.co.uk];
* footage shows an RAF plane's near mid-air collision [news.bbc.co.uk];
* a fireball, filmed over Austin, Texas, collides [news.bbc.co.uk] with Planet Earth.

I feel a conspiracy theory coming on...

Shaddows

11:00 am on Feb 17, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Its the worlds least violent, low impact World War

LifeinAsia

4:28 pm on Feb 17, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Or War of the Worlds...

Shaddows

5:37 pm on Feb 17, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Maybe its an unexpected influence from the Large Hadron collider