Forum Moderators: open
historical sources shows that from whence has been common since the thirteenth century. It has been used by:-
Shakespeare,
Defoe (in the opening of Robinson Crusoe: “He got a good estate by merchandise, and leaving off his trade, lived afterwards at York; from whence he had married my mother”),
Smollett,
Dickens (in A Christmas Carol: “He began to think that the source and secret of this ghostly light might be in the adjoining room, from whence, on further tracing it, it seemed to shine”),
Dryden,
Gibbon,
Twain (in Innocents Abroad: “He traveled all around, till at last he came to the place from whence he started”),
Trollope,
and it appears 27 times in the King James Bible (including Psalm 121: “I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help”).
So what literary genius says "from whence" is wrong ?
< Note: - quote is from [worldwidewords.org...] >
[edited by: tedster at 3:14 am (utc) on Oct. 27, 2008]
[edit reason] attribute the quote [/edit]
So what literary genius says "from whence" is wrong ?
I used the word redundant. Redundancies permeate the language. Who hasn't heard "free gift" overused on infomercials?
Sometimes these phrases have a pleasing sound. Sometimes the user is just naturally wordy. Maybe the user has just heard it over and over and thinks the words must be joined. For whatever reason, it's still a redundancy.
looser
Haha, jdmorgan. It's somewhat amusing when someone writes that someone else is a looser. Makes me wonder who the real loser is. :)
Try and rather than try to always gets my attention. Affidavid appears to be pretty common, Google doesn't even offer a "did you mean affidavit".
One I'm guilty of in informal writing is 'alright", which is never right. Then there's 'beckon call' for 'beck and call'. Dribble instead of drivel, exasperate when the writer or speaker means exacerbate...
>>redundancies
'ATM machine' makes me nuts.
I could go on...
[edited by: digitalghost at 3:34 pm (utc) on Oct. 27, 2008]
The use of 'personally' is curious even when it is not coupled with 'myself'. Is there ever a need to use 'personally' when making a statement?
'Literally', when it is misused for 'figuratively', makes me cringe. Phrases like, "He was literally exploding he was so mad" fly right by without question.
Yet another redundancy that annoys me is, "revert back", as in, "The Soviet Union reverted back to communism".
I've also seen that as 'intensive purposes'. May we talk about 'alterior' motives? ;) Or 'blessing in the sky'? (blessing in disguise) What about 'off the beat and path'? Or pawn off rather than palm off? Or 'splitting image'?
To be fair though, the English language can be infuriating. Just think about mettle, medal, metal and meddle for a minute...
I'm jus anoyed wen tey do it out of lazyness or on perpuss.
It's in print media, or on ads, or anywhere thats supposed to be professionally produced.
Or REALLY stupid things like "literally" before a metaphor