Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Private, No Entry, Keep Out: Google Street View

         

engine

3:55 pm on Aug 25, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month




It seems that Google Street View continues to ignore the private signs, but, according to Google, will try to avoid photographing.
Private, No Entry, Keep Out: [news.cnet.com]Google Street View
Google's Street View service apparently thinks your "no trespassing" and "private road" signs are just for decoration. The service, which gives Web users a driver's perspective of hundreds of cities around the world, has raised the ire of residents who say the images are an invasion of their privacy. Now residents in California's Humboldt County are complaining that the drivers who are hired to collect the images are disregarding private property signs and driving up private roads.

In an episode reported recently by the Santa Rosa Press-Democrat, a Street View driver cruised past two "no trespassing" signs to collect images of a residence that is 1,200 feet from the public road.

"It isn't just a privacy issue; it is a trespassing issue, with their own photos as evidence," resident Betty Webb told the newspaper. "They really went off the track to get to our address."

Google told the newspaper that, while it has the right to photograph from private roads, it tries to avoid it.

lawman

4:48 pm on Aug 25, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



One of these days a street view driver will have a "Deliverance" experience. ;)

Rugles

5:32 pm on Aug 25, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



why, does Ned Beatty live in Humboldt county?

LifeinAsia

5:58 pm on Aug 25, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Very easy solution: Google should just refuse to pay for any images provided under these circumstances. With a financial disincentive, that should cut down the number of renegade drivers who ignore the signs.

If you blame Google for the deeds done by the drivers who disobey the signs, then you might as well blame any users who use Google's Street Views service. (Now that I've broght that up, I wonder how long until we see the first "virtual tresspassing" law suit subpoenaing Google's server logs to find out all the people who viewed a certain property that had no tresspassing signs posted...)

[edited by: LifeinAsia at 5:59 pm (utc) on Aug. 25, 2008]

MatthewHSE

2:22 pm on Aug 26, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Google told the newspaper that, while it has the right to photograph from private roads, it tries to avoid it.
Just how do they have the "right" to do that? Private means private, and I'd say I have the right to expect Google to respect No Trespassing signs on my private property.

One of these days they're going to try this with the wrong person and get their tires shot out or something.

mr_chill

10:07 pm on Aug 26, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I do not want the thief looking for that special something finding it in my driveway. All they would have to do is take a virtual drive until they found what they were looking for. I don't like Google running a locator service for thieves.

pageoneresults

10:20 pm on Aug 26, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Google told the newspaper that, while it has the right to photograph from private roads, it tries to avoid it.

Ya, I know some homeboys too down South who are waiting for your vehicles to show up on their Private Property. If you are the driver of those vehicles, I would strongly suggest that you stay away from those roads marked as private. Those guys/gals don't even know what Google is. All they know is there is a trespasser on their private property. You could have a badge on and it still won't matter. That 12 gauge buckshot hurts! Especially when it is filled with rocksalt for pesky trespassers taking pictures. :)

lawman

10:32 pm on Aug 26, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I hear the sound of duelling banjos. :)

rocker

11:34 pm on Aug 26, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Those guys/gals don't even know what Google is. All they know is there is a trespasser on their private property. You could have a badge on and it still won't matter.That 12 gauge buckshot hurts!

Powderfinger

Look out, Mama, there's a white car coming up the road....

Rugles

6:53 pm on Aug 27, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



..With a big red beacon, and a flag, and a man on the rail

Western

9:57 pm on Aug 27, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Cameras on the top of the vans aren't going to slow down anyone's trigger finger.

pageoneresults

5:18 am on Aug 28, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Actually, Google's Street View is child's play compared to this...

earthmine inc
[earthmine.com...]

Watch the 6 minute demo here.

earthmine Platform at DEMO Conference
[youtube.com...]

The buzzwords? Georeferenced Data and Point Clouds.

"Pa, looks like we need to move to Plan B?"

incrediBILL

11:13 pm on Aug 28, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Caught this on the local news the other night as some locals are fighting back.

[arstechnica.com...]

"It isn't just a privacy issue; it is a trespassing issue with their own photos as evidence," Betty Webb, a Humboldt County, CA, resident told The Press Democrat. Webb and residents of other counties like Sonoma are complaining now that Google's drivers have flat-out ignored over one hundred private roads, "No Trespassing" signs, and at least one barking watchdog in their quest to photograph roads and homes.

Looks like we need to change NO TRESPASSING to include NOINDEX, NOFOLLOW and NOARCHIVE as well!

Google claimed in court that complete privacy doesn't exist:

[informationweek.com...]

With satellites, cameras and other monitoring devices all being tied together by the Internet, it is becoming more and more difficult to completely isolate yourself from view.

I'm sorry but it's a bit of a stretch to go from satellite photos to being on the ground, behind no trespassing signs, gates, a mile down the road... and keeping a straight face about it.

Let's just see how well those arguments hold up when they start photographing in the backwoods where the hillbillies will shoot at anything that doesn't have a local license plate. I can guarantee that some people where I grew up would have that Google camera stuffed and mounted on a wall if it came down their 2 mile dirt road.

Cue the theme from Deliverance...

[edited by: incrediBILL at 11:15 pm (utc) on Aug. 28, 2008]

lawman

11:43 pm on Aug 28, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It was cued in posts 2 & 8 of this thread. :)