Forum Moderators: open
A Brooklyn man was sentenced to 30 months in prison on Tuesday for sending spam e-mails to more than 1.2 million subscribers of America Online in a scheme that foiled the Internet company's spam-filtering system. Adam Vitale, 27, was sentenced in federal court in Manhattan after pleading guilty more than a year ago to breaking anti-spam laws. He was also ordered to pay $180,000 to AOL in restitution.
I like the jail time component! But let's see how long he actually has to spend there. These days, a 30-month prison sentence for a non-violent crime means, what, an hour and a half before release for good behavior?
While he's there, I think his only contact with the outside world should through a dial-up modem via an E-mail address that has been used to register on 50 different "FREE gift" sites.
[edited by: LifeinAsia at 3:56 pm (utc) on July 16, 2008]
While he's there, I think his only contact with the outside world should through a dial-up modem via an E-mail address that has been used to register on 50 different "FREE gift" sites.
He should be made to manually sort through a billion emails with the subject "Get out of jail" with only one of them actually getting him out of jail. :P
They should give him a minute of jail time for each estimated minute he wasted of real people's time.
Interestingly enough, a 30 month sentence would roughly work out to 912 days, or 1,313,280 minutes..
If the average time wasted by those 1,200,000 people was less than a minute...I'd estimate he'll be serving more minutes than the total amount of minutes wasted..
To put that amount of jail time in perspective, he'll be able to watch 59,694 episodes of Cosby Show re-runs..
Then again, people who have had their time wasted by his spam emails and see only a few cents compensation are going to ask questions! 15 cents to compensate me for one spam email? Far too little.
For those of us not familiar with parochial US law, what does that mean exactly?
This should represent AOL's actual loss/expenses as a result of his actions, e.g. legal fees. I did not read the article, but the courts could also assign punitive damages, generally an arbitrary figure for such things as "pain and suffering."
It is possible that a recipient of his spam could sue him civilly or as a class action suit and seek punitive damages. Then again, they have to prove it was him though, in civil court, the burden of proof is far lower than criminal court. A good example would be OJ Simpson.
Marshall
AOL can also sue. Getting a judgment for $180k should be easy. If it can prove more than $180k in damages it can get a judgment for that too. Once it has a judgment, it can attach whatever property he now owns or will own in the future.
And don't forget that happy little institution called the IRS. If he didn't pay taxes on the spam money, they'll want their cut (along with penalty and interest).
BTW the only ones who usually make any money to speak of in class action lawsuits are the attorneys - and that's assuming there are deep enough pockets for the attorneys to even want to get involved. :)
BTW the only ones who usually make any money to speak of in class action lawsuits are the attorneys - and that's assuming there are deep enough pockets for the attorneys to even want to get involved. :)