Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Why do people do this?

Annoying driving habits

         

Essex_boy

1:28 pm on Jan 10, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



This happens a lot where I live as its fairly rural and it is, people driving alone at 40 mph in a 60 mph clear conditions, then when they enter a 30mph zone they still drive at 40mph!

It really drives me nuts, so why do they do it?

BeeDeeDubbleU

8:05 am on Jan 15, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Seems like everyone in California drives with a cell phone glued to their ear.

Isn't this against the law yet in the US? It is here in the UK although not very well enforced.

Old_Honky

5:57 pm on Jan 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I heard on radio 4 the other day that using a mobile (cell) phone when driving is now illegal, even if you use a hands free kit!

The argument is that talking distracts you. So why don't they ban passengers, the radio, sat nav, smoking, scratching your backside, picking your nose, adjusting the aircon, switching the headlights on and anything else that might distract you.

The world has gorn mad!

Did anyone see that interesting feature on newsnight recently where the facts seem to point out that Traffic Lights cause accidents and traffic jams. If you take the lights out everyone drives with more caution and the traffic flow is better. Anarchy works in this instance.

Perhaps those that rule us are trying to control us just a tad too much.

jsinger

6:15 pm on Jan 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Once I got into Massachusetts it was a different story

And how! Driving Cape Cod years ago from Boston I was doing just above the speed limit (55 then?)and overtook maybe three cars the whole long ride.

-------
Ever noticed how some idiots actually speed up in dangerous areas? I think it's a macho thing.

wyweb

6:19 pm on Jan 16, 2008 (gmt 0)



Isn't this against the law yet in the US?

I think it's been left mostly up to local or maybe even state jurisdictions to decide how to handle it. I could be wrong about that.

I was behind a woman just yesterday at a red light who was talking on her cell phone. Light turned green and she just sat there. I gave her a good 10 seconds or so and then blasted her with my horn. One hand held the phone to her ear and the other was gesturing wildly. 10 more seconds passed and I blasted her again. That got her attention and she started moving, flipping me off in the process.

Ban them all I say. I turn mine off when I'm driving. Not out of any safety concerns but mainly because I know somebody's going to ask me a question I can't answer since I'm not at my desk.

jsinger

6:22 pm on Jan 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Perhaps those that rule us are trying to control us just a tad too much.

The rules are trying to control vehicles. You can do all of those things while walking.

BTW, if you do any of those distracting things while taking the drivers test you'll likely flunk. Two hands on the wheel.

Some (U.S.)state laws have long said you must use the "highest" level of control of your car.

We must be doing something right. Auto deaths continue to fall in the U.S.

jsinger

6:35 pm on Jan 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



That got her attention and she started moving, flipping me off in the process.

Had a driver on a cell phone bump my car. I honked and he did the same thing, all the time continuing his chat.

(this discussion is starting to ruin my morning... rehashing old idiots LOL)

wyweb

7:10 pm on Jan 16, 2008 (gmt 0)



I don't see a whole heck of a lot of difference in talking to someone on your cell phone while you're driving and talking to someone who's in the passenger seat. Some people can multi-task and some people can't. It's the one's that can't that worry me.

To be perfectly honest I'm more concerned about the 89 year old woman (or man) driving 35MPH in a 60MPH zone than I am cell phone talkers.

BeeDeeDubbleU

7:35 pm on Jan 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The argument is that talking distracts you. So why don't they ban passengers, the radio, sat nav, smoking, scratching your backside, picking your nose, adjusting the aircon, switching the headlights on and anything else that might distract you.

Talking does distract you. There is no doubt about that. Is there anyone who disputes that driving with one hand for ten minutes and a cell phone stuck to your ear makes it harder to control your car?

Radios and Sat Nav can also distract you. I remember nearly ramming someone myself while looking for a track on an old cassette tape. We'll never know how many people actually get involved in accident while messing around with ICE systems. Clearly they would never admit to it and there would seldom be any evidence of what they were doing at the moment of impact.

Cars are becoming full of distractions nowadays. Aggregating all of these distractions creates a real risk situation that unfortunately has to be controlled.

[edited by: BeeDeeDubbleU at 7:36 pm (utc) on Jan. 16, 2008]

DamonHD

8:36 pm on Jan 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It's fairly well established that talking to someone on the phone is often far more distracting than talking to someone in the car.

Why?

Because someone in car can see when you need to concentrate and shut up. Someone on the phone can't.

Rgds

Damon

jsinger

8:48 pm on Jan 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Most dangerous distraction for me is fastening my seat belt. Grope to find it; then fiddle with the buckling process. But the risk--probably considerable--only lasts 5-15 seconds.

Problem with cell phones is that some drivers, it seems, are always chatting on them.

timster

10:19 pm on Jan 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The argument is that talking distracts you.

Experiments have repeatedly demonstrated that driving while talking on the cell phone is about as dangerous as driving with a 0.08 blood alcohol level.

[unews.utah.edu ]

vincevincevince

1:52 am on Jan 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Most dangerous distraction for me is fastening my seat belt

I've never had the need to fasten a seat belt whilst the car is moving. Why would you not fasten it before you start the engine and go?

jsinger

2:34 am on Jan 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I rarely used my belt on local trips until after the death of Princess Di in '97. Only the passenger wearing a belt survived that famous high speed crash. That struck a chord with me (and many others, I understand)

Cars didn't have seat belts when I started driving. Often takes me a few minutes to remember to buckle up.

jsinger

5:32 am on Jan 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Most dangerous distraction for me is fastening my seat belt. Grope to find it; then fiddle with the buckling process. But the risk--probably considerable--only lasts 5-15 seconds.

Problem with cell phones is that some drivers, it seems, are always chatting on them.

Habtom

5:49 am on Jan 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Most dangerous distraction for me is fastening my seat belt.

I made it much of a habit, I fasten my seat belt as soon as I get into a car, even if it means moving it for a few meters.

I use the turn signals as much too, I find myself making signals while changing lanes or turning left or right even when there is hardly any moving thing on the street. :)

I have this question. Do people driving in a city they just got in to for a visit, somehow believe the traffic rules in the dest city doesn't apply apply to them?

Or it is just here?

[edited by: Habtom at 5:52 am (utc) on Jan. 17, 2008]

le_gber

10:09 am on Jan 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Most dangerous distraction for me is fastening my seat belt. Grope to find it; then fiddle with the buckling process. But the risk--probably considerable--only lasts 5-15 seconds.
If you take your driving test and start your car without your seatbelt on - you flunked. I put it even to move my car a couple of metres. If I don't put it, I feel like I'm missing something and can't drive properly :).

I sometimes wish that I was a cop to be honest. Just to give tickets to all those idiots who drive with their mobile phone in one hand, or that overtake me driving at 90 miles an hour on the dual carriageway. Even complete driving bans for those who do both at the same time - happens every morning!

sem4u

10:17 am on Jan 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



le_gber - I would love to do that in an unmarked police car. I would be stopping people all day long round here ;)

wyweb

12:31 pm on Jan 17, 2008 (gmt 0)



More pet peeves: Rolling stops. Yeah I'd like to be a cop sometimes. Stop means stop. I do it. You need to do it too.

People driving 40 MPH in a 20 MPH school zone. Fortunately the cops have a zero tolerance for that in my city but people still do it anyway.

Old_Honky

12:57 am on Jan 18, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I don't see any problem with driving and holding a conversation either with a passenger or with a hands free phone. Holding the phone with one hand or manually dialling a number while driving is a different story.

I remember reading a few years ago that female drivers should be banned from having female passengers because when women have a conversation they like to scrutinise each other's face to (perhaps subconsciously) make sure they are being honest. Since then I have noticed that when driving on the motorway behind two women they do tend to swivel their heads and look at each other more than men do.

Presumably men are not worried if their passenger is telling the truth or not. Probably most of us aren't really listening unless the topic of conversation is us personally. Women drivers also don't turn to look at male passengers so much. I suspect they think we are not telling the truth most of the time so they don't need to check.

ispy

4:17 am on Jan 27, 2008 (gmt 0)



A lot of people dont keep their eyes glued to the speedometer. Its called leisure driving and its very relaxing. You should try it sometime.

Habtom

5:42 am on Jan 27, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



A lot of people dont keep their eyes glued to the speedometer.

In a little while, it ain't difficult to learn to know your speed without looking at it.

Jane_Doe

9:25 pm on Jan 27, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It really drives me nuts, so why do they do it?

Some people are just weird. I went to get carry out (take away for you Brits) and the guy in front of me insisted on keeping at least 6 feet of space in front of him, even when the line would move up he would just move up a little and still keep six feet way from the customer in front of him. This put the rest of in the line (queue) in front of the door to collide with the new customers coming in and of course the new customers were confused about where the, line ended because it seemed like it logically ended in front of him.

Sometimes it seems like some people were raised by wolves and they just don't even understand how simple things like lines at cash registers are supposed to work.

This 52 message thread spans 2 pages: 52