Forum Moderators: open
I have an R300 here and have tried originals and clones, and there is no apparent difference in quality, although there is a huge difference in the price. One set of clones equals a single original cartridge.
The problem with using a clone is that the printer manufacturer can always blame the clone cartridge if there is a problem. My printer is well outside its warranty period in any case, so i'm not really worried about that.
It's time the genuine cartridges came down in price, imho.
Good to know that you don't have any problems with the Epson ink cartridges
I used to have a lexmark printer, and the cartridges were outrageously expensive, and when I went to the shop they pointed out that I could buy a new canon printer for the same price as the new cartridges for the lexmark, and the canon cartridges were only a couple of quid a time. So I walked out of there with a new printer, ditched my lexmark and haven't looked back.
Lesson: It really pays to research the price of ink before deciding on a brand of printer!
That was the primary factor for myself, when I was last researching a new printer. Secondary was the cost of specialty papers, such as matte & glossy photo stock.
In the end, I went with a Canon Pixma model. I've had it a couple of years now and am happy. It has five ink tanks (two blacks), but I've never used third-party inks since Canon bundles "free" photo paper with their inks. It's a decent deal that has left me with a glut of photo stock!