Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Bill Gates is no longer the richest!

         

tedster

4:10 am on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Signs of the times. The richest person in the world today, according to this BBC report, is not a US citizen -- and not an Internet mogul either, at least not directly.

Mexico's telecoms tycoon Carlos Slim has overtaken Bill Gates to become the world's richest person, according to a respected Mexican financial website.

Mr Slim is now worth $67.8bn (£33.6bn), above Microsoft founder Mr Gates' $59.2bn, Sentido Comun says.

[news.bbc.co.uk...]

At $59.2bn, I think Bill still has a relatively comfortable lifestyle.

DrDoc

7:00 am on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Bill was already passed a couple years ago, albeit going back and forth for a brief time, by Ingvar Kamprad, founder of IKEA.

Then again, I think Bill could still be the richest, if that was his purpose.

vincevincevince

7:20 am on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I always have my doubts about some of these calculations. To my mind they have to be based upon something objective such as the amount of cold hard cash the person could realistically convert their assets into given a month to do it.

You may have a large share in an expensive company, but if you (a) stopped being involved in the company and (b) put all your shareholding on the market... you would certainly not get nearly the asset value you had on paper.

Likewise, with a big portfolio, asset values can depend upon other asset values. Liquidating one set of assets could easily pull the value of another set of assets down considerably. When you have a lot of money, getting it into cash inevitably means disruption to the market.

Finally, with only around 800 billion US$ in circulation, pulling in up to a tenth of that will cause instant deflation based on the fact you now have cash from lots of people and you've not spent it again. That alone would mean the more assets you liquidised, the less you could get for the remaining assets - basically because people will not have the cash to buy them.

nuevojefe

7:36 am on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Carlos comes into a local client of ours' business every now and again and there are literally federal agents watching his every move from what I've been told. Pretty crazy...

Marshall

10:36 am on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The only problem with wealth based on shares of stock is the volatility of the stock, though once you passed that billion point, I guess you don't care. I remember on point around 2000/2001 or so, Gates was estimated at over 100 billion.

On a side but somewhat related not, according to estimates from Time magazine, there are approximately 960 billionaires in the world controlling 3.5 trillion dollars (US) or about 1,736,000,000,000 BP.

It's only money :)

Marshall

pageoneresults

11:31 am on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It's only money.

It's only paper.

Green_Grass

2:47 pm on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Well..

Recently I read a LEE CHILD thriller (the Jack Reacher series) and learnt that the USD currency is actually NOT PAPER.

It is 75% cotton and 25% Linen.

so......

[treas.gov...]

oddsod

3:30 pm on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It's only paper.

Money comes in non-metal form as well!? Damn, I'm in the wrong business :)

ergophobe

4:57 pm on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month




actually NOT PAPER.

It is 75% cotton and 25% Linen.

Huh? I don't think you know what the definition of paper is.

Anyway, I remember seeing this thing about how much Michael Jordan made (this was when he was at his peak). It assumed that his earnings were spread out over the year 24/7 and were just for being Michael Jordan and had things like

- while MJ watches a movie he makes $7,000
- while he sleeps, MJ makes $31,000

and after about a hundred such things, it said "And if he made that much every hour for the next 78 years, he would make less than Bill Gates made last year".

Samizdata

8:31 pm on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Rags make paper
Paper makes money
Money makes banks
Banks make loans
Loans make beggars
Beggars make rags
Rags make paper...

londrum

8:32 pm on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



he may be rich, but is he happy

tbear

12:58 am on Jul 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I think we are talking about wealthy, here....
I live 200% rich life, but I don't have 2 pennies (cents) to rub together.;)

Visit Thailand

1:16 am on Jul 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I feel for him. Perhaps we should have a quick whip around.....

On a serious note, these amounts of money are staggering, and incomrehensible to most of us mere mortals.

I find the stories of what happens after a "normal" person wins the lottery in the UK or US etc. Highly entertaining.....and terribly sad some of the time.