Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

40% Tax

         

internetheaven

10:22 pm on Mar 1, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



40% is a disgusting amount to have to pay once you cross over thirty grand (in the UK). The average house price in the UK is £200,000 (a hell of a lot more in London!). You have to be on £55,000 a year just to get a mortgage for an average house in the UK and then they tax you 40% of your earnings! Does that make sense to anyone?

Gmorgan

2:40 pm on Mar 7, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The taxes in the UK are disgusting. Don't even get me started on inheritance tax (40% tax on income already taxed 40% = about 64% tax on money earnt)

davec

2:43 pm on Mar 7, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Like most things in life, you get what you pay for.

If that were true I wouldn't mind so much. The fact remains that the more you earn in the UK not only the higher the tax you pay, but the higher the percentage of tax you pay. At the same time those that pay the most tax take the least amount back out of the system.

I've got no problems with paying tax, but I'd like to get value for money, and I really believe there should be a cap on the amount of tax an individual can pay.

rj87uk

3:50 pm on Mar 7, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



All of the UK problems come from people who don't get jobs. They get benefits that add up to a LOT, free everything. The next problem is druggies again on benefits + more.

Now if the UK got every one in work there would be less benefits to pay and getting in more tax that 'could' lead to lower tax rates as they are saving money and getting more in at the same time.

So the UK in my eyes needs to get more people in employment and off benefits. I enjoy working and spending what I earn but the people who don't gets jobs and get benefits end up with more than what I get, by that I mean houses are reduced rent, free dental, glasses, health etc etc. Their kids get free lunches, reduced costs on day trips where working mum and dads pay for all this full cost.

I think the majority of the UK problems come from unemployment and that is why the UK has a tax problem. Now this is just what I think and I am most probably wrong, enlighten me!

Rugles

5:01 pm on Mar 7, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>>not only the higher the tax you pay, but the higher the percentage of tax you pay.

That is called progressive taxation. We have that here in Canada, I think the States has it to. It is always a shock when you move into the next income tax bracket.

Essex_boy

5:42 pm on Mar 7, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Incorporate in a word.

I live in England, earn over £30k pa and only pay around £1000 pa in tax, one year it was only £250 (02 - 03). Play them at their own game.

willybfriendly

6:47 pm on Mar 7, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



noblesse oblige

The rise of capitalists and indivdiual wealth has perhaps changed the use of the term some, but the concept remains.

Those that avoid taxes for the sole purpose of personal gain/greed have lost sight of the "common wealth" that facilitates their personal wealth.

Those that complain about taxes are just being human;)

WBF

TinkyWinky

12:22 am on Mar 8, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



40% is a disgusting amount to have to pay once you cross over thirty grand (in the UK).

LOL - blimey I wouldn't mind if that's all it was...

Try 40% plus 17.5% VAT on most items (except food and books) plus road tax £180 pa plus £110 TV licence plus...

I could go on... I am sure I remember someone working out all the tax liability and it's like 65% plus (if you earn over the £33,300).

Or put another way, Tax freedom day (i.e. when you are working to put money in your pocket not the government's) is nearly half the year - June 3rd.

I really wouldn't mind if the NHS was getting better at coping... blah blah blah... the usual moan

<typos>

[edited by: TinkyWinky at 12:23 am (utc) on Mar. 8, 2007]

Crush

8:19 pm on Mar 8, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Not many people do it because everyone is scared of the government but it is actually easy not to pay all taxes and I know a lot of people who do not and they will NEVER get caught. You just need to set it up properly.

Of course now people are thinking...oh...arrr..better be safe I am scared of the gov. They have the legal right to steal half of your money, so I think it is your right to try and protect yourself from their greedy coffers.

I believe in fair taxes and fortunately do not live in the UK anymore but from recent figures I have seen the state now takes 54% of all money. The state cares more about itself than the private sector which is where the real money comes from. If you have any sense get yourself a tax solution and stick 2 fingers up at Gordon Brown.

lawman

9:43 am on Mar 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The number of billionaires in the world has risen to nearly 1,000 - with 29 Britons [itv.com] now making it into the ultra-rich club.

Hey, how'd that happen? :)

Crush

11:27 am on Mar 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



offshore bank accounts?

[edited by: Crush at 11:27 am (utc) on Mar. 9, 2007]

gamiziuk

1:15 pm on Mar 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The number of billionaires in the world has risen to nearly 1,000 - with 29 Britons now making it into the ultra-rich club.


Inflation.

That paper money we circulate just keeps losing value all the time...

lawman

1:21 pm on Mar 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you're talking about real money. :)

Syzygy

3:59 pm on Mar 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



American or British billions?

lawman

6:55 pm on Mar 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



OK, so make it a brizillion.

iamlost

7:37 pm on Mar 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month




Hey, how'd that happen? :)

Inflation.

$100.00CAD now equals:
$82.12 in 1997
$61.17 in 1987
$29.39 in 1977
...
$6.75 in 1917

The dollar, my friends, just isn't what it used to be.

This 45 message thread spans 2 pages: 45