Forum Moderators: open
"Lawmakers in two U.S. states — California and New Jersey — and in the United Kingdom have also proposed bills to ban incandescent bulbs."
[businessweek.com...]
Next they'll be banning coal fired computers
[edited by: encyclo at 5:05 pm (utc) on Feb. 20, 2007]
[edit reason] added link to article [/edit]
Most of my home uses Halogen lights. Not sure if they're good or bad for the environment but they throw a better light.
One problem is that fluorescent fixtures take a fair amount of power to light up. Not ideal for bathrooms or closets, for example, that are used for brief periods.
These energy savings deals rarely work as advertised. Our city hall tried to save money by turning down the temperature. So workers brought electric space heaters to work. Very inefficient plus the extra load nearly burned down the 100 year old building.
The colour of light output from the newest compact fluourescent lamps is now much better than when they were first introduced. I found some excellent alternatives for our home, and, bar only a few specialist lamps, there are no incandescent lamps in regular use.
Halogen do use a little less energy than incandescent lamps, but are relatively expensive to buy.
LED lamps are now becoming much better and these offer the highest energy saving possibilities. There's still a little way to go yet before they will be cost-effective and practical, but it won't be long.
I'm also looking forward to seeing LED lighting become more prevalent, and more inexpensive. The numbers I've seen show that LED beats fluorescent by a wide margin.
I'd also like to see wind turbines (perhaps solar shingles, too) on people's homes. Long ago farmers all had windmills to take care of some of their needs ... it'd be great to see this technology make a comeback to meet our current energy demand.
They still won't sign the Kyoto treaty though... :(
I am hoping LED fixtures penetrate the home lighting market, soon.
According to today's 11:00 news, some politicians in Canada are talking about doing the same thing - banning incandescents. I'm OK with that just as long as I can still get a replacement buld for that little one inside my oven.
For me being able to control the level of light in a room is extremely important. What I'm hoping for is a "smart" generation of LEDs that allow one to control light levels in a room. I really think that florescent bulbs will be replaced by LEDs as the primary alternative technology to incandescent bulbs within the next several years so I'm really looking to leapfrog over florescent lights.
That is very impressive!
I guess they have been planning it for a while if they already have the supplies and the manpower in place.
Good Job Australia!
The weather change is part of a larger variation which we dont really understand yet, this is total rubbish.
Errmm... no, seriously, Essex_boy, on an evening when you're not busy get a copy of "An Inconvenient Truth" on DVD and watch it.
If you still hold this same opinion by the time you've finished watching the documentary then I'll accept that's your considered opinion.
But at least watch the documentary.
I'm in Sydney, and we had someone come to our door and he said that, if we wanted him to, he would exchange all our lightbulbs with compact fluourescent ones. We said yes, and he did. Free of charge, paid for by the government.
Where did the government get the money to pay for that? Surely those "free" light bulbs didn't come out of your taxes! ;)
[edited by: GaryK at 3:36 am (utc) on Feb. 27, 2007]