Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Senator: Illegal images must be reported

child pornography or some forms of "obscenity"

         

walkman

2:08 am on Dec 13, 2006 (gmt 0)



how about a 25 year moratorium in new laws? I think we have enough :)

[news.com.com...]
"After child pornography or some forms of "obscenity" are found and reported, the Web site must retain any "information relating to the facts or circumstances" of the incident for at least six months. Webmasters would be immune from civil and criminal liability if they followed the specified procedures exactly."
....
"Internet service providers already must follow those reporting requirements. But McCain's proposal is liable to be controversial because it levies the same regulatory scheme--and even stiffer penalties--on even individual bloggers who offer discussion areas on their Web sites."

percentages

6:23 am on Dec 13, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>how about a 25 year moratorium in new laws? I think we have enough

How about we close down all forms of Government for 25 years (except Judicial). It would be good for tax payers!

We certainly don't need any new laws, we need the Judicery to catch up and make senisible rulings on all the nonsense that has happened in the past :)

The USA has a constitution that relys on 9 guys doing the right thing, while 10's of thousands of other government officials are trying to do the wrong thing!

It is a losing battle for those with commonsense! We really need a time-out to allow them to catch up, or suggest a better system!

Any country that requires 83,000+ pages to explain how someone should pay taxes has a problem. Most people in the street could do it in a single sentance or two. At worst it should be a single page of plain English!

At the end of the day all USA laws are subject to Supreme Court approval. So why not ditch all the posturing in-between and just get to the heart of the matter and the ruling that really counts!

Of course hundreds of thousands of people are employed to ensure this never happens, or, at least not that quickly :(

plumsauce

6:44 am on Dec 13, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hah!

some forms of "obscenity"

everybody, report all pictures of politicians, once a day.

for violating community standards.

twice, if their mouth is open.

three times, if they are kissing a baby.

Jordo needs a drink

7:52 am on Dec 13, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



How about we close down all forms of Government for 25 years (except Judicial). It would be good for tax payers!

The problem with that is judicial has been creating laws and legislation from the bench...

Really no way out.

Marcia

8:59 am on Dec 13, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



This thread is getting uncomfortably political IMHO, but the "balance of power" we've got has been working for a long, long time; and regardless of what any legislator tries to push through the Congress, there's enough diversity among elected officials to temper potential legislation with balance.

Sorry if anyone who likes to view girlie pics may be offended at the possibility of some invasion of their coveted anonymity, but I've worked as a chat bouncer at a women's community and have seen and had to deal with first-hand some of the seamier side there is to the web.

how about a 25 year moratorium in new laws? I think we have enough

Maybe there aren't enough, and just maybe the ones that exist haven't been succinct enough to be effective for what they're intended to accomplish.

Honest question: What in the world is wrong with simply keeping records?

[edited by: Marcia at 9:32 am (utc) on Dec. 13, 2006]

walkman

4:10 pm on Dec 13, 2006 (gmt 0)



>> Honest question: What in the world is wrong with simply keeping records?
Honest question: What in the world is wrong with simply having a Govt' camera in your house? This way if someone breaks in or attacks you, the Govt' can help you.

Of course a better answer would have to say that search records are VERY private, one can essentially piece together what you like, dislike, your thoughts, and so on. And, it's never "Simply keeping records": they will mined and abused. It never fails.

[edited by: trillianjedi at 5:08 pm (utc) on Dec. 13, 2006]
[edit reason] See sticky ;) [/edit]

Marcia

10:09 am on Dec 14, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



First off, let's establish that what's being discussed is things that are ILLEGAL in the first place. What goes on in a person's home is decidly not the same thing as what goes on in a public venue such as the internet; and let's be perfectly clear about responsibility: Those who FACILITATE illegal activities can in no way be granted immunity from responsiblity for their complicity. Hence, those whose facilities are used to perpetrate illegal activities should be held accountable for what they consciously and willingly allow to be perpetrated in whatever venue they have control over.

Keeping politics and personal biases and tastes out of it altogether - it's an issue of accountability and responsibility.

search records are VERY private

No, they are not private. Especially if the provider of the search and access capability is being complicit in illegal activities. Sorry, but the argument doesn't hold water. The ISP may possibly be aiding and abetting illegal activities and should be held accountable for providing information to the authorities charged with apprehending the perpetrators of illegal activities.

[edited by: Marcia at 10:14 am (utc) on Dec. 14, 2006]