Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.162.211.233

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL & lawman

Message Too Old, No Replies

SPAM Maker Sees Trademark Bid Canned

     
5:56 pm on Oct 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:23040
votes: 330


Hormel Foods Corporation, which owns the trademark for spiced ham food product SPAM, has failed in its attempt to register "spam" as an EU-wide trademark when used to designate unsolicited emails.

Hormel attempted to register "spam" as a trademark when used to refer to "services to avoid or suppress unsolicited emails", and the "creation and maintenance of computer software; technical consultancy, particularly in combination with network services; [and] providing of expertise, engineering services and technical consulting services [related to junk email]".

SPAM Maker Sees Trademark Bid Canned [news.zdnet.co.uk]

6:35 pm on Oct 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 12, 2003
posts:196
votes: 0


The should have sent samples for that frothy goodness in advance.
6:50 pm on Oct 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 24, 2005
posts:173
votes: 0


Knuckleheads. Good example of corporate staff lawyers trying to justify their existence.
9:02 pm on Oct 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 31, 2003
posts:1316
votes: 0


"Hormel is acting like a corporate cry baby," added Cartmell. "Dozens of companies use the word 'spam' in their legal and commercial names and no one confuses any of us with the Hormel canned-meat product."
12:01 am on Oct 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 12, 2005
posts:411
votes: 0


I'm not sure on EU specific trademark law but Good for the EU in denying this application.

Hormell doesn't operate in a trade that deals with email products. My understanding is that you need to have a product or have intent to in order to register a trademark.

For exmaple, Microsoft can't register a trademark "Microsoft" for a soft drink beverage class if they don't have a beverage to offer for trade, or the intent to.

To me, it seems like the wanted to register the trademark so they can liscense it out to companies that do work in that trade.

Even if they did start offering an email product, they still wouldn't be eligible, to the best of my understanding, because the word is commonly used and now obvious.

To me it seemed like Hormell had less than pure intents, like their less than pure food stuff.

[edited by: Jeremy_H at 12:05 am (utc) on Oct. 6, 2006]

11:42 pm on Oct 9, 2006 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 24, 2002
posts:373
votes: 0


--For exmaple, Microsoft can't register a trademark "Microsoft" for a soft drink beverage class if they don't have a beverage to offer for trade, or the intent to.--

I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be allowed to use the name Microsoft without their permission though, whatever the product.

Of course it might be different if their name was a word that existed before they did. For example I'm sure it'd be possible to sell a beverage called "Amazon" without worrying about Amazon.com's lawyers.

The trouble is the word "Spam" didn't exist before the company that makes spam meat products invented it.

9:52 pm on Oct 16, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 25, 2005
posts:677
votes: 0


I hope that EU will ban their application
 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members