Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Firefox Updates Itself With Pocket Integration, Reader View & Firefox

         

tangor

8:13 pm on Jun 3, 2015 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



These are Major Minor updates... meaning not a lot changed, just turned on some stuff.

Every Mozilla Firefox user who has updated his/her installation from 38.0.4 to 38.0.5 today would have noticed some welcome additions to the third most popular internet browser in the world. Apart from the usual performance enhancements and bug fixes, the Mozilla Firefox (version 38.0.5) has got three new important features.


[crazyengineers.com...]

Those new features are Pocket (a read it later catchall), Reader View (an ad/side nav killer... though if running NoScript you will have to allow it to work) and tabbed Screen shots for Hello sharing.

None of these are new features to the web... others have hand them for some time, but they are new to the base build of Firefox.

explorador

3:11 pm on Jun 8, 2015 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Content scrapping // Adsense // people just skipping ads

Been a pocket user for quite a while and loving it BUT I'm a well behaved user. It helps me to KEEP archive of good content, mostly science, electronic projects and medicine discoveries. Still, I don't like what FF did integrating it with the browser. Yes pocket has been here for a while and most of what has been said is true but this I believe changes the game: the underestimation or showing less than kind respect towards other people content. Worked on a media company and this is too attractive for lazy reporters, but this is more a human thing than a tech thing, still... do you see the point of giving razors to everyone? it's a tool, yes, just like a knife.

Kinda difficult to address all that's been said. While I agree with Tangor, this is not exactly accurate:
Tangor: User can't use Pocket UNLESS THEY ARE ALREADY ON YOUR PAGE

There is article "A" with inner links about meaning, complements, etc. Navigation is stripped, ads are also stripped BUT once the article has been included on pocket, links can be used to "add to pocket" without leaving the app on your tablet and without even using the browser.

Sounds like a minor thing... but good webmasters know the importance of inner links tying your own content, expanding meanings and references. Thus, someone who uses this good techniques (also qualify as usability techniques) are fried, well if not fried deeply hurt because it hits exactly where it hurts, on a good practice that really takes time.

For those who think this is a minor thing, there are good articles and discussions here on WebmasterWorld revealing how important this is and then get a picture on how much work it takes, inner links are not just that, it takes adding title and / or alts, take a GOOD article and guess, it has or at least needs 5 to 10 words with references on your own site. Got it? hurts, so much care so a new tool helps people to keep stealing content? I will keep using this features on my sites but hoping not everyone crosses the bridge and start massively using this tool.

Oh and about ads, being on your site already, it's true but consider the online newspaper model ads-based. With pocket it's easy to get your own day newspaper without even seeing the ads or wasting time because usually, those sites are heavy, slow and loaded with extra stuff.

I might be wrong but, a good fast site, built to last and giving that strong impression, might also give very few reasons to skip navs and use reader views, if we keep sites readable I don't think we should worry much. Just my two cents, can't talk all I think right now so I might fail but that's the main idea.

super70s

12:54 am on Jun 9, 2015 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Pocket wouldn't even make the top 25 in a list of disruptive changes to the online publishing world since 1995.


Reminds me of all the people with DVR's who recorded programs back in 2008 but still haven't gotten around to watching them yet.

IanCP

2:33 am on Jun 9, 2015 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Reminds me of all the people with DVR's who recorded programs back in 2008 but still haven't gotten around to watching them yet.

Please leave me out of this - just because I have 1.4 TB of films, and 3.7 TB of other programmes, documentaries etc spread over three external HDD doesn't mean I don't watch them.

Proven mighty handy sometimes when people want to debate [argue] an issue, and I can produce a copy of "what was actually said" the next day.

A philosophy which has paid for itself handsomely over the decades in beer and cigs. The same with electronics/computer trivia where I can produce things like Intel Data Books from the 1970's.

Q: Did Intel ever produce an Intel 80186 CPU between the 8086 and ill fated 80286? IT professionals [main frame] in the 1990's paid dearly with cartons of beer over that one. Shooting fish in a barrel.
This 33 message thread spans 2 pages: 33