Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.158.194.80

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL

Message Too Old, No Replies

Firefox 3.1 beta 2

     
12:13 am on Dec 9, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member swa66 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 7, 2003
posts:4783
votes: 0


Firefox 3.1 Beta2 was released

Quoting [developer.mozilla.org...] :


New features and changes in this milestone that require feedback include:
  • This beta is now available in 54 languages - get your local version and let us know if it looks right.
  • A new Private Browsing Mode that allows you to browse without Firefox storing any traces of where youve been - perfect for online holiday shopping!
  • New functions that make it easy to remove the history of your past few hours of browsing, or remove all traces of a website.
  • New support for web worker threads.
  • The new TraceMonkey JavaScript engine is now on by default for web content.
  • Improvements to the Gecko layout engine, including speculative parsing for faster content rendering.
  • Removed the new tab-switching & preview behavior based on feedback from Beta 1 users
  • Support for new web technologies such as the <video> and <audio> elements, the W3C Geolocation API, JavaScript query selectors, CSS 2.1 and 3 properties, SVG transforms and offline applications.
9:46 am on Dec 9, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 5, 2002
posts: 1318
votes: 0


speculative parsing for faster content rendering

What exactly is that?

11:58 am on Dec 9, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

joined:July 29, 2007
posts:1780
votes: 100


A new Private Browsing Mode that allows you to browse without Firefox storing any traces of where you�ve been - perfect for online holiday shopping!

Is 3.1 Beta2 ushering in the death of affiliate marketing? No cookies = no refferal fees. Does the "any trace" include cookies too?

12:15 pm on Dec 9, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from FR 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member henry0 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 19, 2003
posts: 4428
votes: 9


Why does the downloadable exec comes from .ru
I stopped it
does yours too come from Russia?
12:39 pm on Dec 9, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

joined:July 29, 2007
posts:1780
votes: 100


Not enough material to read and no feedback yet so I haven't downloaded it.

If the new version blocks affiliates by default a lot of sites will pack it in though I can't imagine Mozilla would think it's a good idea to block cookies by default. Waiting patiently to hear on the matter...

1:17 pm on Dec 9, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:June 18, 2005
posts:1810
votes: 65


No cookies = no refferal fees.

No cookies, no login on many sites requiring user accounts, so I doubt they disable it during the session, ideally they would just erase it all when the browser is closed.

1:55 pm on Dec 9, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

joined:July 29, 2007
posts:1780
votes: 100


So long as the affiliate code sticks when the visitors changes sites...

Clearing cookies when the browser is closed already exists so it's not the "new" they're talking about(see:tools/options/private data). I wonder how many millions of dollars that little checkbox has cost affiliates.

[edited by: JS_Harris at 1:57 pm (utc) on Dec. 9, 2008]

1:59 pm on Dec 9, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from FR 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member henry0 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 19, 2003
posts: 4428
votes: 9


ideally they would just erase it all when the browser is closed.

As per computerWorld it works as described above

I earlier mentioned a download.ru
I guess they offer a random d-load location to balance the downloads heavy traffic, the next one when I tried again was .de

4:52 pm on Dec 9, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 20, 2008
posts:673
votes: 0


the un of browsers
5:37 pm on Dec 9, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 17, 2002
posts:2251
votes: 0


I don't get what they mean about 2.x users being offered a free [developer.mozilla.org] upgrade? Is that some silly attempt at humor? Or perhaps a lame attempt at marketing?
7:38 pm on Dec 9, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 22, 2005
posts:1176
votes: 15


I don't get what they mean about 2.x users being offered a free upgrade? Is that some silly attempt at humor? Or perhaps a lame attempt at marketing?

I saw that as well. Couldn't make it make sense.

1:51 am on Dec 10, 2008 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator robert_charlton is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 11, 2000
posts:12075
votes: 334


...2.x users being offered a free upgrade...

Maybe that's the next step before they offer to pay users to upgrade. ;)

Note that the upgrade choices are "Later"/ "Never"/ "Get the new version"... and that "Never" doesn't mean never.

Is it faster?

12:01 pm on Dec 10, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from FR 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member henry0 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 19, 2003
posts: 4428
votes: 9


You better keep your prior version (anyway this beta won't overwrite a previous version if d-loaded in another dir/)
Reason: 3.1 has almost none of the usual plugins available such as yslow etc...
 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members