Forum Moderators: open
I've been informed that the BBC is a custom-built CMS, but as I'm only used to using Open Source CMSs, I'd be very interested to know whether this is the standard for the bigger guys out there or whether they almost always tailor-make their sites.
ALso, one of the things I've been told is that bigger sites don't use php & mysql, which I think is crap because I've seen that Facebook uses MySQL & PHP with Javascript along with other big sites.
I work part-time for an organisation that uses Plone (that comment on php-mysql was by a Plone advocate btw), which seems to have good workflow and is speedy when caching pages. However, it seems immensely complex in comparison to Joomla, Wordpress etc.
Because I'm always looking for a good flexible CMS for clients that won't confuse them, I find myself drawn to things like Wordpress, Drupal and had a dabble in Exponent (seems similar to modx at first glance).
So, it would be useful to know what the more professional of you do when you get higher up the ladder and deal with bigger sites (I'm very much a beginner programmer, only modding a few things here and there, but is it all about building from scratch at the end of the day?).
Thanks for reading this far!
[search.cpan.org...]
They've been quoted as saying that they use Ruby on Rails for internal projects, but they had to build Perl on Rails to scale-up to production speeds for their public sites.
Neither is a CMS - they are both MVC application frameworks. I suppose they've probably implemented some sort of CMS functionality on top of their framework, though.