Forum Moderators: DixonJones

Message Too Old, No Replies

Is this what the new Inktomi looks like?

Man, this is a strange one for me.

         

pendanticist

6:52 am on Mar 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



crawl-66-249-64-44.googlebot.com - - [03/Mar/2005:20:11:33 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 - "-" "Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.google.com/bot.html)"
lj2420.inktomisearch.com - - [03/Mar/2005:20:17:35 -0800] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0" 200 2004 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Yahoo! Slurp; [help.yahoo.com...]
lj2256.inktomisearch.com - - [03/Mar/2005:20:17:35 -0800] "GET /Blah_blah.html HTTP/1.0" 200 7338 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Yahoo! Slurp; [help.yahoo.com...]

Straight outta Google 2400 E. Bayshore Parkway City: Mountain View

pendanticist

8:13 am on Mar 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Eh, too late to edit:

crawl-66-249-64-44.googlebot.com - - [03/Mar/2005:20:11:33 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 - "-" "Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.google.com/bot.html)"

Has NoThInG to do with the thread. Duh.

claus

10:09 am on Mar 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Wooooot? You're saying that Slurp is coming from a Gbot IP? (or, possibly, that Gbot is "under cover" as Slurp)

This is a scoop, nothing less.

(pure speculation: Could this be a licencing agreement between Y! and G about spidering capacity - Gbot essentially being an "engine" for Slurp?)

I've got to take another close look at those log files now. I've just been through one for one day with 40 different Slurp IPs, all Yahoo ones.

pendanticist

4:23 pm on Mar 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Has NoThInG to do with the thread. Duh.

I, apparently, was as tired when posting as you were when reading. LOL...

No claus, it was simply too late to edit after I realized I'd pasted too much in there.

My host server switched the way visitors are portrayed in my access_log files from, what I'll call, pure IP Numbers to what you see represented. This particular entry was the very beginnings of the switchover and I inadvertantly copied the Google line as well. The sub-comment was in reference to the log changes I mentioned seeing.

By the time I'd realized what I'd done ( the application I use [Webwerx] still had the info highlighted from the 'copy' function and immediately I saw Google had no reason to be included ), it was too late to edit my post....

:o

Glenn.

sem4u

4:27 pm on Mar 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I have been getting a load of these too, e.g.:

lj2024.inktomisearch.com
lj2051.inktomisearch.com
lj2165.inktomisearch.com